Dew-Becker v. Wu
Supreme Court of Illinois
April 16, 2020, Opinion Filed
(Docket No. 124472)
[*P1] In this case, we must determine whether ] the loser of a head-to-head contest on a daily fantasy sports website may recover money lost to the winner of the contest under section 28-8(a) of the Criminal Code of 2012 (720 ILCS 5/28-8(a) (West 2014)). For the following reasons, we hold that recovery is unavailable.
[*P3] On April 4, 2016, the plaintiff, Colin Dew-Becker, filed a complaint in the circuit court of Cook County against the defendant, Andrew Wu. The complaint alleged that plaintiff and defendant had engaged in a daily fantasy sports (DFS) contest on a website known as FanDuel and that, as a result of this contest, plaintiff had lost $100 to defendant. The complaint further alleged that the DFS contest constituted illegal gambling under Illinois law and, therefore, plaintiff was entitled to recover the lost money under section 28-8(a) of the Criminal Code of 2012 (id. § 28-8(a)), a statutory provision which allows the loser of certain illegal bets to seek recovery [**2] from the winner.
[*P4] At a bench trial, plaintiff testified that in a DFS contest each participant creates a virtual roster of players by selecting from among current athletes in a real professional or amateur sports league. Each participant then earns fantasy points based on how well the selected athletes perform individually in their actual professional or college sports games on a given day. After all such games are completed, a total score is calculated for each of the virtual rosters, and the winner of the contest is the participant whose roster has the most points. A head-to-head DFS contest is one that involves only two participants who compete against each other directly.
[*P5] Plaintiff testified that on April 1, 2016, he and defendant each paid a $109 entrance fee to participate in a head-to-head DFS contest on the FanDuel website. The contest involved National Basketball Association (NBA) games, and both plaintiff and defendant selected a fantasy roster of nine NBA players. Plaintiff stated that he understood when entering the contest that the winner would keep $200, the loser would get nothing, and FanDuel would keep $18. Plaintiff testified that defendant won the DFS contest by a [**3] score of 221.1 to 96.3 and that defendant received the $200 due him.Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.
Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
2020 IL 124472 *; 2020 Ill. LEXIS 389 **
COLIN DEW-BECKER, Appellant, v. ANDREW WU, Appellee.
Notice: THIS DECISION IS NOT FINAL UNTIL EXPIRATION OF THE 21 DAY PETITION FOR REHEARING PERIOD.
Prior History: Dew-Becker v. Wu, 2018 IL App (1st) 171675, 2018 Ill. App. LEXIS 955, 428 Ill. Dec. 622, 123 N.E.3d 86 (Dec. 14, 2018)
contest, skill, gambling, sports, predominate, fantasy, appellate court, game of chance, games, wager, websites, studies, head-to-head, winner, poker, illegal gambling, game of skill, statistics, players, screen name, athletes, courts, loser, contingent event, qualitative
Business & Corporate Compliance, Governments, State & Territorial Governments, Gaming & Lotteries, Governments, Legislation, Statutory Remedies & Rights, Civil Procedure, Appeals, Standards of Review, De Novo Review, Interpretation, Discovery & Disclosure, Discovery, Constitutional Law, The Judiciary, Case or Controversy, Constitutionality of Legislation