Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
99 F. Supp. 3d 37 *; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49819 **; 165 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P36,335
PEGGY DINKEL, VALARIE GADSON, AND DEIDRE BECKFORD, for themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. MEDSTAR HEALTH INC. and WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER, Defendants
Prior History: Dinkel v. Medstar Health, Inc., 286 F.R.D. 28, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103136 (D.D.C., July 25, 2012)
principal activity, maintenance activities, indispensable, summary judgment, integral, employees, renew a motion, battery-plant, showering, clothes, genuine, summary judgment motion, briefing, spent, material fact, Fair Labor Standards Act, qualify, plant
Civil Procedure, Judgments, Summary Judgment, Entitlement as Matter of Law, Burdens of Proof, Movant Persuasion & Proof, Supporting Materials, Evidentiary Considerations, Nonmovant Persuasion & Proof, Business & Corporate Compliance, Wage & Hour Laws, Statutory Application, Portal-to-Portal Act