Thank You For Submiting Feedback!
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
March 11, 2021, Decided; March 11, 2021, Filed
Civil Action No. 20-18792 (SDW) (LDW)
LETTER OPINION FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT
Before this Court is Defendant Transportation Insurance Company's ("Defendant")1 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Arash Emami, M.D., P.C., Inc.'s2 ("Plaintiff" or "University Spine") Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("Rule") 12(b)(6). This Court having considered the parties' submissions, having reached its decision without oral argument pursuant to Rule 78, and for the reasons discussed below, grants Defendant's motion.
A. Standard of Review
An adequate complaint must be "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." FED. R. CIV. P. 8(a)(2). This Rule "requires more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do. Factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level[.]" Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 127 S. Ct. 1955, 167 L. Ed. 2d 929 (2007) (internal citations omitted); see also Phillips v. Cty. of Allegheny, 515 F.3d 224, 231 (3d Cir. 2008) (stating [*2] that Rule 8 "requires a 'showing,' rather than a blanket assertion, of an entitlement to relief").
In considering a Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), the Court must "accept all factual allegations as true, construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and determine whether, under any reasonable reading of the complaint, the plaintiff may be entitled to relief." Phillips, 515 F.3d at 231 (external citation omitted). However, "the tenet that a court must accept as true all of the allegations contained in a complaint is inapplicable to legal conclusions. Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice." Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 173 L. Ed. 2d 868 (2009).
B. Plaintiff Has Failed to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted
Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60753 *; 2021 WL 1137997
Arash Emami, M.D., P.C., Inc. v. CNA and Transportation Ins. Co.,
Notice: NOT FOR PUBLICATION
physical loss, Orders, motion to dismiss, property damage, coverage, commercial property, factual allegations, ability to provide, described premises, entitled to relief, incurred expenses, provide coverage, cause of action, medical care, restoration, suspension, surgeries, elective, pandemic, recitals, losses, spread, Spine, virus