Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
653 F.3d 1314 *; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 15650 **; 99 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1522 ***
EON-NET LP, Plaintiff/Sanctioned Party-Appellant, and ZIMMERMAN & LEVI, L.L.P. AND JEAN-MARC ZIMMERMAN, Sanctioned Parties-Appellants, v. FLAGSTAR BANCORP, Defendant-Appellee.
Subsequent History: Rehearing denied by, Rehearing, en banc, denied by Eon-Net LP v. Flagstar Bancorp, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 26447 (Fed. Cir., Sept. 27, 2011)
US Supreme Court certiorari denied by Zimmerman v. Flagstar Bancorp, 132 S. Ct. 2391, 182 L. Ed. 2d 1020, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 3458 (U.S., 2012)
Prior History: [**1] Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in Case No. 05-CV-2129, Judge Ricardo S. Martinez.
Eon-Net, L.P. v. Flagstar Bancorp, Inc., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143114 (W.D. Wash., Jan. 4, 2010)Eon-Net, L.P. v. Flagstar Bancorp, Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24080 (W.D. Wash., Mar. 4, 2009)Eon-Net, L.P. v. Flagstar Bancorp, Inc., 239 F.R.D. 609, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95720 (W.D. Wash., 2006)
district court, patent, hard copy, written description, documents, exceptional case, invention, originating, input, processing, infringement, baseless, sanctions, extract, costs, terms, attorney's fees, specification, format, misconduct, settlement, argues, patentee, portions, alleged infringement, instructions, lawsuits, asserted claim, bad faith, noninfringement
Patent Law, Jurisdiction & Review, Standards of Review, De Novo Review, Claims, Claim Language, General Overview, Infringement Actions, Claim Interpretation, Claim Differentiation, Damages, Collateral Assessments, Attorney Fees, Evidence, Relevance, Preservation of Relevant Evidence, Spoliation, Civil Procedure, Discovery & Disclosure, Sanctions, Baseless Filings, Certification Requirements