Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Law School Case Brief
  • Case Opinion

Espinoza v. Mont. Dep't of Revenue

Supreme Court of the United States

January 22, 2020, Argued; June 30, 2020, Decided

No. 18-1195.

Opinion

 [*2251]  Chief Justice Roberts delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Montana Legislature established a program to provide tuition assistance to parents who send their children to private schools. The program grants a tax credit to anyone who donates to certain organizations that in turn award scholarships to selected students attending such schools. When petitioners sought to use the scholarships at a religious school, the Montana Supreme Court struck down the program. The Court relied on the “no-aid” provision of the State Constitution, which prohibits any aid to a school controlled by a “church, sect, or denomination.” The question presented is whether the Free Exercise Clause of the United States Constitution barred that application of the no-aid provision.

In 2015, the Montana Legislature sought “to provide parental and student choice in education” by enacting a scholarship program for students attending private schools. 2015 Mont. Laws p. 2168, § 7. The program grants a tax credit of up to $150 to any taxpayer who donates to a participating [***6]  “student scholarship organization.” Mont. Code Ann. §§ 15-30-3103(1), -3111(1) (2019). The scholarship organizations then use the donations to  [**686]  award scholarships to children for tuition at a private school. §§ 15-30-3102(7)(a), -3103(1)(c).1

So far only one scholarship organization, Big Sky Scholarships, has participated in the program. Big Sky focuses on providing scholarships to families who face financial hardship or have children with disabilities. Scholarship organizations like Big Sky must, among other requirements, maintain an application process for awarding the scholarships; use at least 90% of all donations on scholarship awards; and comply with state reporting and monitoring requirements. §§ 15-30-3103(1), -3105(1), -3113(1).

A family whose child is awarded a scholarship under the program may use it at any “qualified education provider”—that is, any private school that meets certain accreditation, testing, and safety requirements. See § 15-30-3102(7). Virtually every private school in Montana qualifies. Upon receiving a scholarship, the family designates its school of choice, and the scholarship organization sends the scholarship funds directly to the school. § 15-30-3104(1). Neither the scholarship organization nor its donors can restrict awards to particular types of [***7]  schools. See §§ 15-30-3103(1)(b), -3111(1).

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

140 S. Ct. 2246 *; 207 L. Ed. 2d 679 **; 2020 U.S. LEXIS 3518 ***; 28 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 467; 2020 WL 3518364

KENDRA ESPINOZA, et al., Petitioners v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, et al.

Notice: The LEXIS pagination of this document is subject to change pending release of the final published version.

Subsequent History: Remanded by Espinoza v. Mont. Dep't of Revenue, 2020 Mont. LEXIS 2209 (Mont., Aug. 12, 2020)

Prior History:  [***1] ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA

Espinoza v. Mont. Dep't of Revenue, 2018 MT 306, 393 Mont. 446, 435 P.3d 603, 2018 Mont. LEXIS 435 (Dec. 12, 2018)

Disposition: 2018 MT 306, 393 Mont. 446, 435 P. 3d 603, reversed and remanded.

CORE TERMS

religious, religion, no-aid, schools, religious school, church, funding, private school, sectarian, cases, free exercise, tax credit, Clauses, teach, benefits, discriminated, secular, sect, provisions, subsidize, exercise of religion, religious education, denomination, invalidating, reasons, Amici, free exercise of religion, plurality opinion, forbids, attend

Education Law, Administration & Operation, Student Financial Aid, Eligibility for Financial Aid, Student Financial Aid, Constitutional Law, Fundamental Freedoms, Freedom of Religion, Establishment of Religion, Free Exercise of Religion, Freedom of Speech, Scope, Supremacy Clause