Not a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Freeman v. Wyeth

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

May 23, 2014, Submitted; August 13, 2014, Filed

No. 13-3556

Opinion

 [*807]  MELLOY, Circuit Judge.

Patricia Freeman was a plaintiff in a multidistrict litigation ("MDL") suit brought against Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and related entities (collectively, "Wyeth"). The district court1 dismissed Freeman's case for failure to prosecute and later denied her motion to reconsider. We affirm.

In early 2009, Freeman sued Wyeth in New York state court, alleging that she developed *** cancer after using Wyeth's hormone therapy medication, Prempro. Wyeth timely removed the case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Shortly [*808]  thereafter, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict  [**2] Litigation transferred the case to the Eastern District of Arkansas as part of the ongoing In re Prempro Products Liability Litigation, 254 F. Supp. 2d 1366, created in 2003.

The clerk of court for the Eastern District of Arkansas opened an individual docket for Freeman's case on May 12, 2009. The next day, the clerk filed in Freeman's docket a memorandum that contained important information (the "transfer memorandum") regarding the MDL's use of the Case Management/Electronic Case Files ("CM-ECF") system. Relevant to this appeal, the transfer memorandum instructed Freeman's attorney as follows:

Attorneys are required to electronically file documents in the Prempro Products Liability Litigation (MDL 1507) and all related cases, absent unusual circumstances. If you have not previously registered for electronic filing in the Eastern District of Arkansas, you must complete the enclosed Electronic Case Filing Registration Form and submit it to the Clerk's office. Attorneys who do not register for electronic filing will not receive notices of electronic filing, nor will they receive hard copies of orders. (See Judge Wilson's Order of September 19, 2005.)

Judge Wilson's Order of September 19, 2005, in turn,  [**3] read as follows:

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

764 F.3d 806 *; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15504 **; 89 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 632; 2014 WL 3929103

Patricia Freeman, Plaintiff - Appellant v. Wyeth; Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Defendants - Appellees

Prior History:  [**1] Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock.

In re Prempro Prods. Liab. Litig., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109029 (E.D. Ark., Aug. 1, 2014)

Disposition: Affirmed.

CORE TERMS

district court, electronic, register, cases, orders, warned, failure to prosecute

Civil Procedure, Appeals, Reviewability of Lower Court Decisions, Timing of Appeals, Standards of Review, Abuse of Discretion, Relief From Judgments, Excusable Mistakes & Neglect, General Overview, Excusable Neglect, Dismissal, Involuntary Dismissals, Failure to Comply, Preliminary Considerations, Venue, Multidistrict Litigation, Pretrial Judgments, Default & Default Judgments, Default Judgments