Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
199 Cal. App. 4th 1038 *; 131 Cal. Rptr. 3d 129 **; 2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 1265 ***
FRESH EXPRESS INCORPORATED, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BEAZLEY SYNDICATE 2623/623 AT LLOYD'S et al., Defendants and Appellants.
Subsequent History: [***1] The Publication Status of this Document has been Changed by the Court from Unpublished to Published October 4, 2011.
Time for Granting or Denying Review Extended Fresh Express, Inc. v. Beazley Syndicate 2623/623 at Lloyd's, 2011 Cal. LEXIS 13308 (Cal., Dec. 28, 2011)
Review denied by Fresh Express v. Beazley Syndicate 2623/623 at Lloyd's, 2012 Cal. LEXIS 881 (Cal., Jan. 11, 2012)
Prior History: Superior Court of Monterey County No. M88545, Susan M Dauphiné, Judge.
Disposition: The court reversed the judgment and remanded the matter with directions that the trial court enter a judgment of dismissal.
Fresh, spinach, outbreak, coli, advisory, Insured, Contamination, losses, products, Farms, purchases, suppliers, bagged, spot, Ranch, damages, cases, food safety, exemption, substantial evidence, coverage, processing, consumers, audit, costs, reasonable cause, direct result, trial court, consumption, recoverable
Insurance Law, Policy Interpretation, Ambiguous Terms, Construction Against Insurers, Claim, Contract & Practice Issues, Exclusions, Plain Language, Reasonable Expectations, General Overview, Entire Contract, Question of Law, Civil Procedure, Standards of Review, Substantial Evidence