Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
841 F.3d 460 *; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 19535 **; 2016-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P79,806
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORK, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Subsequent History: Injunction granted at, On reconsideration by FTC v. Advocate Health Care, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37707 (N.D. Ill., Mar. 16, 2017)
Prior History: [**1] Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 15 C 11473 — Jorge L. Alonso, Judge.
FTC v. Advocate Health Care, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79645 (N.D. Ill., June 20, 2016)
patients, geographic, merger, markets, candidate, insurers, percent, increased price, medical center, hypothetical, monopolist, district court, network, prices, customers, effective, region, travel, silent majority, competitors, hospital care, fallacy, merging, local hospital, convenience, consumers, cluster, preliminary injunction, iterations, equivocal
Antitrust & Trade Law, Clayton Act, Scope, Mergers & Acquisitions Law, Antitrust, Antitrust Statutes, Clayton Act, Market Definition, Relevant Market, Geographic Market Definition, Market Definition, Regulated Practices, Regulated Industries, Claims, Civil Procedure, Appeals, Standards of Review, Abuse of Discretion, Clearly Erroneous Review, De Novo Review, Questions of Fact & Law