Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
838 F.3d 327 *; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 17525 **; 2016-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P79,767
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION; COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellants v. PENN STATE HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER; PINNACLE HEALTH SYSTEM
Prior History: [**1] On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. (M.D. Pa. No. 1-15-cv-02362). District Judge: Honorable John E. Jones, III.
FTC v. Penn State Hershey Med. Ctr., 185 F. Supp. 3d 552, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60814 (M.D. Pa., May 9, 2016)
merger, district court, patients, geographic, anticompetitive, payors, hypothetical, preliminary injunction, monopolist, insurers, effects, prima facie case, relevant market, healthcare, network, prices, increased price, contracting, injunction, savings, merging, weigh, post-merger, parties, proposed merger, public interest, cognizable, consumers, risk-based, benefits
Civil Procedure, Remedies, Injunctions, Preliminary & Temporary Injunctions, Appeals, Standards of Review, Antitrust & Trade Law, Market Definition, Relevant Market, Geographic Market Definition, Standards of Review, Clearly Erroneous Review, Questions of Fact & Law, US Federal Trade Commission Actions, Remedial Powers, Federal Trade Commission Act, Mergers & Acquisitions Law, Antitrust, Antitrust Statutes, Clayton Act, Clayton Act, Claims, Evidence, Burdens of Proof, Burden Shifting, Regulated Practices, Relevant Market, Market Definition, Horizontal Mergers, Healthcare Law, Healthcare Litigation, Antitrust Actions, Facilities, Remedies