Garcia v. Santa Maria Resort, Inc.

Garcia v. Santa Maria Resort, Inc.

Opinion

 [*1285]  ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS

THIS MATTER came before the Court on Defendants All Keys, Inc., Ralph Sanchez, Daniel Sanchez, and Jason Barroso's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law [D.E. # 32] and Defendant, Santa Maria Resort, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law [D.E. # 34] (collectively, the "Motions"). The Court heard  [*1286]  argument of counsel on the Motions on July 24, 2007. The Court then addressed Plaintiffs' Motion to [sic] Clarification of Ruling on Motions to Dismiss [D.E. # 44], through an Order Granting  [**2] Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification and Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice [D.E. # 56].

The Court has carefully reviewed the record, including (i) the First Amended Complaint [D.E. # 28], (ii) the Motions, (iii) the "Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants All Keys Inc., Ralph Sanchez, Daniel Sanchez and Jason Barroso's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 32)" [D.E. # 40] and "Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Santa Maria's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 34)" [D.E. # 41] filed by plaintiffs Silvio Garcia, John Deviddio, Jr., Glennon Pataky, Dan Schoneck, Joanna Schoneck, Robert Montanari, and John Dunleavey, (iv) Defendants All Keys, Inc., Ralph Sanchez, Daniel Sanchez and Jason Barroso's Reply in Support of their Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint [D.E. # 42], and (v) the briefing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Clarification. Being fully advised in the premises, the Court hereby rules on the Motions.

I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.