Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court

Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of the United States

March 29, 1982, Argued ; June 23, 1982, Decided

No. 81-611

Opinion

 [*598]  [***251]  [**2615]    JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

 Section 16A of Chapter 278 of the Massachusetts General Laws, 2 as  [***252]  construed by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, requires trial judges, at trials for specified sexual offenses involving a victim under the age of 18, to exclude the press and general public from the courtroom during the testimony of that victim. The question presented is whether the statute thus construed violates the First Amendment as applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment.

 [****6]  [**2616]   I

The case began when appellant, Globe Newspaper Co. (Globe), unsuccessfully attempted to gain access to a rape trial conducted in the Superior Court for the County of Norfolk, Commonwealth of Massachusetts.  The criminal defendant in that trial had been charged with the forcible rape and forced unnatural rape of three girls who were minors at the time of trial -- two 16 years of age and one 17. In April 1979, during hearings on several preliminary motions, the trial judge ordered the courtroom closed. 3 Before the trial  [*599]  began, Globe moved that the court revoke this closure order, hold hearings on any future such orders, and permit appellant to intervene "for the limited purpose of asserting its rights to access to the trial and hearings on related preliminary motions." App. 12a-14a. The trial court denied Globe's motions, 4 relying on Mass. Gen. Laws Ann., ch. 278, § 16A (West 1981), and ordered the exclusion of the press and general public from the courtroom during the trial. The defendant immediately objected to that exclusion order, and the prosecution stated for purposes of the record that the order was issued on the court's "own motion and not at  [****7]  the request of the Commonwealth." App. 18a.

Within hours after the court had issued its exclusion order, Globe sought injunctive relief from a justice of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. 5 [****8]  The next day the justice conducted a hearing, at which the Commonwealth, "on behalf of the victims," waived "whatever rights it [might] have [had] to exclude the press." Id., at 28a. 6 Nevertheless,  [*600]  Globe's request for relief  [***253]  was denied. Before Globe appealed to the full court, the rape trial proceeded and the defendant was acquitted.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

457 U.S. 596 *; 102 S. Ct. 2613 **; 73 L. Ed. 2d 248 ***; 1982 U.S. LEXIS 137 ****; 8 Media L. Rep. 1689

GLOBE NEWSPAPER CO. v. SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF NORFOLK

Prior History:  [****1]  APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS.

Disposition:  383 Mass. 838, 423 N. E. 2d 773, reversed.

CORE TERMS

criminal trial, Newspapers, closure, press, access rights, minor victim, mandatory, cases, rape, rights, sexual, plurality opinion, terms, general public, sex crime, proceedings, minors, press and public, public testimony, state interest, public access, trial court, circumstances, courtroom, trauma, protect a child, psychological, overriding, narrowly, evading

Constitutional Law, Bill of Rights, State Application, Criminal Law & Procedure, Preliminary Proceedings, Pretrial Motions & Procedures, Exclusion of Public From Courtroom, Civil Procedure, Justiciability, Mootness, General Overview, Case or Controversy, Trials, Examination of Witnesses, Child Witnesses, Case & Controversy Requirements, The Judiciary, Freedom of Speech, Free Press, Fundamental Freedoms, Public Access