Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Green v. Comm'r

Green v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

January 29, 2014, Filed

Docket No. 779-11

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KERRIGAN, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency of $22,983 and a penalty of $2,097 under section 6662(a) with respect to petitioners' Federal income tax for tax year 2009.

 [*2]  Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the tax year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. We round all monetary amounts to the nearest dollar.

After concessions, the remaining issues for consideration are (1) whether any part of the $100,000 petitioner wife received in the settlement of a lawsuit against her former employer is excludable from income under section 104(a)(1) or (2) and (2) whether petitioners are liable for the accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a).1

Background

This case was fully stipulated under Rule 122. The stipulated facts are incorporated in our findings by this reference. Petitioners resided in Virginia when they filed the petition.

In April  [**2] 2002 petitioner wife suffered an on-the-job injury to her neck and back while working as a waitress at the Greenbriar Hotel (former employer) in West Virginia.2 She received worker's compensation total disability benefits from  [*3]  April 12, 2002, through November 24, 2003.3 On September 30, 2002, petitioner wife received a release to return to work, and she returned to work briefly in October 2002. In March 2003 petitioner wife received a second release to work. Her former employer required that she take a functional capacity exam (FCE) before returning to work. On June 11, 2003, an FCE was held. She did not pass the FCE and did not meet the physical demands of her previous position. Her former employer did not have an alternative position available.

Petitioner wife underwent two additional FCEs and was not cleared to return to her prior position. The third and final FCE showed some health concerns which resulted in a recommendation for petitioner wife to follow up  [**3] with her personal physician. This led to her employment's being terminated on November 8, 2004.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

T.C. Memo 2014-23 *; 2014 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 23 **

MAZIE C. GREEN AND NEWTON R. GREEN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Disposition:  [**1] Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

CORE TERMS

sickness, physical injury, settlement, former employer, workers' compensation, excludable, settlement agreement, income tax, damages, wages, emotional distress, gross income, tax year, reasonable cause, general release, title vii, taxpayer

Evidence, Inferences & Presumptions, Presumptions, Tax Law, Audits & Investigations, Burdens of Proof, Burden of Taxpayer, Tax Credits & Liabilities, Deficiencies, General Overview, Governments, Legislation, Interpretation, Compensation & Welfare Benefits, Tips, Wages & Other Compensation, Federal Income Tax Computation, Gross Income, Disability Payments, Worker Compensation Payments, Injuries & Sickness, Business & Corporate Compliance, Civil Penalties, Accuracy Related Penalty, Burden of Government