Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Health Freedom Def. Fund, Inc. v. Biden

Health Freedom Def. Fund, Inc. v. Biden

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division

April 18, 2022, Decided; April 18, 2022, Filed

Case No: 8:21-cv-1693-KKM-AEP

Opinion

ORDER

As travelers have been reminded for more than a year, federal law requires wearing a mask in airports, train stations, and other transportation hubs as well as on airplanes, buses, trains, and most other public conveyances in the United States. [*2]  Failure to comply may result in civil and criminal penalties, including removal from the conveyance. This masking requirement—commonly known as the Mask Mandate—is a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) regulation published in the Federal Register on February 3, 2021.

In July 2021, Sarah Pope, Ana Daza, and Health Freedom Defense Fund sued various government officials and the CDC, seeking a declaratory judgment that the Mask Mandate was unlawful and to have it set aside for violating the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Following submission of the administrative record, Defendants—collectively referred to as "the government"—moved for summary judgment on January 18, 2022. (Doc. 45.) As provided in the parties' agreed briefing schedule, Plaintiffs filed a cross motion for summary judgment on February 17, 2022. (Doc. 48.) The parties completed briefing on March 31, 2022. The cross motions for summary judgment are now ripe for review. The Court concludes that the Mask Mandate exceeds the CDC's statutory authority and violates the procedures required for agency rulemaking under the APA. Accordingly, the Court vacates the Mandate and remands it to the CDC.

I. BACKGROUND

In December [*3]  2019, a highly contagious respiratory virus colloquially known as COVID-19 began spreading throughout the world. A month later, the Secretary of Health and Human Services declared COVID-19 a public health emergency. See Determination That a Public Health Emergency Exists, U.S. Dep't of Health & Hum. Servs., https://www.phe.gov/emergency/news/healthactions/phe/Pages/2019-nCoV.aspx (Jan. 31, 2020). And then on March 13, 2020, President Trump declared the COVID-19 outbreak a national emergency. See Declaring a National Emergency Concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak, 85 Fed. Reg. 15337, 15337 (Mar. 13, 2020).

COVID-19 continued to spread throughout 2020 despite experiments with "unprecedented movement restrictions and social distancing measures." (Doc. 30 at 41.) By the end of 2020, approximately twenty million Americans had been infected with COVID-19 and over 360,000 Americans had died from it. See COVID Data Tracker, Ctrs. for Disease Control & Prevention, https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/ (last visited Apr. 13, 2022). The fall and winter of 2020 also brought a spike in new COVID-19 infections, due in part to emerging variants of the virus, some of which were more severe than the original strain and more [*4]  easily transmissible. Id.; (Doc. 30 at 12-15). The number of new cases peaked in early January 2021 and decreased steadily in February. See COVID Data Tracker, Ctrs. for Disease Control & Prevention, https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#trends_dailycases (last visited Apr. 11, 2022).

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71206 *; __ F.Supp.3d __; 2022 WL 1134138

HEALTH FREEDOM DEFENSE FUND, INC., ANA CAROLINA DAZA, and SARAH POPE, Plaintiffs, v. JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States, et al., Defendants.

Prior History: Health Freedom Def. Fund, Inc. v. Biden, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224099, 2021 WL 5416688 (M.D. Fla., Nov. 19, 2021)

CORE TERMS

CDC, Mask, sanitation, notice, good cause, measures, regulations, quotation, disease, courts, travel, vacatur, spread, invoked, conveyance, words, agency's action, public health, infected, clean, quarantine, deference, wear a mask, reasons, Dictionary, Prevention, fumigation, violates, wear, public interest

Public Health & Welfare Law, Healthcare, Public Health Security, Communicable Diseases, Transportation Law, Public Transportation, Civil Procedure, Summary Judgment, Entitlement as Matter of Law, Appropriateness, Judgments, Entitlement as Matter of Law, Materiality of Facts, Genuine Disputes, Legal Entitlement, Administrative Law, Judicial Review, Standards of Review, Arbitrary & Capricious Standard of Review, Exceeding Statutory Authority, Separation of Powers, Legislative Controls, Explicit Delegation of Authority, Governments, Legislation, Interpretation, Deference to Agency Statutory Interpretation, Scope of Delegated Authority, Police Powers, Agency Rulemaking, Informal Rulemaking, Notice & Comment Requirements, Rule Application & Interpretation, Binding Effect, Formal Rulemaking, Evidence, Burdens of Proof, Allocation, Standards of Review, Agency Rulemaking, Agency Adjudication, Decisions, Contents, Rule Interpretation, Validity, Remand & Remittitur, Remedies, Remedies, Injunctions, Courts, Authority to Adjudicate