Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

In re Air Crash near Clarence Ctr.

In re Air Crash near Clarence Ctr.

United States District Court for the Western District of New York

December 12, 2010, Decided; December 12, 2010, Filed

09-md-2085; 09-CV-1039S; 09-CV-1040S; 09-CV-1041S; 09-CV-1042S; 09-CV-1087S

Opinion

DECISION AND ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

On February 12, 2009, Continental Connection Flight 3407 crashed on approach to the Buffalo Niagara International Airport, killing all 49 people aboard and one person on the ground. All federal litigation related to the crash has been transferred by the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to the Western District of New York for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. (Docket No. 1. 1 )

Presently before this Court are Motions to Remand filed by the plaintiffs in five lawsuits that the defendants removed from the New York State  [*3] Supreme Court, County of Erie. Plaintiffs contend that remand is required because federal jurisdiction is nonexistent. Plaintiffs also seek costs and attorney fees. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs' Motions to Remand will be granted and their request for attorney fees and costs will be denied.

II. BACKGROUND

In November 2009, Plaintiffs filed their respective complaints in the New York Supreme Court, County of Erie, against Defendants Colgan Air, Inc., Pinnacle Airlines Corp., Continental Airlines, Inc., and FlightSafety International, Inc. ("FlightSafety"). The complaints are substantially similar to one another: each asserts negligence claims against Colgan, Pinnacle, and Continental (Johnston Complaint, ¶¶ 42-48 2 ); negligent performance of a contractual duty, third-party beneficiary breach of contract, and negligence claims against FlightSafety (Johnston Complaint, ¶¶ 49-66); and wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering/pre-impact terror claims against all defendants (Johnston Complaint, ¶¶ 67-72).

Most pertinent here are the allegations against FlightSafety, which is a New York corporation with its principal place of business in New York. (Johnston Complaint, ¶ 8.) Plaintiffs allege that FlightSafety trained (or failed to train) the captain of the aircraft, Marvin Renslow, and the first officer, Rebecca Lynne Shaw, pursuant to a training agreement with Colgan, Pinnacle, and/or Continental. (Johnston Complaint, ¶¶ 13, 33, 35.)

Plaintiffs allege that FlightSafety was responsible for providing the necessary flight simulator training to qualify Renslow as a captain on the aircraft at issue — a Bombardier Dash 8-Q400 — and that Renslow was trained in November 2008 in St. Louis, MO, using FlightSafety's Dash 8-Q400 simulator. (Johnston Complaint, ¶¶ 33, 34, 62.)

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130846 *; 2010 WL 5185106

IN RE: AIR CRASH NEAR CLARENCE CENTER, NEW YORK, ON FEBRUARY 12, 2009,

Subsequent History: Motion granted by, Motion denied by In re Air Cash near Clarence Ctr., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78464 (W.D.N.Y., July 18, 2011)

Prior History: In re Air Crash near Clarence Ctr., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110934 (W.D.N.Y., Oct. 19, 2010)

CORE TERMS

training, Plaintiffs', cause of action, federal law, removal, preemption, malpractice, preempted, state court, flight, field preemption, state claims, costs, attorney's fees, federal-question, contractual, aircraft, cases, diversity jurisdiction, federal jurisdiction, fraudulent joinder, federal statute, allegations, non-diverse, diversity, simulator, state-law, asserts, negligent performance, malpractice claim