Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
926 F.2d 1423 *; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 3685 **; 32 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (Callaghan) 472
IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA FOR ATTORNEY REPRESENTING CRIMINAL DEFENDANT JOSE EVARISTO REYES-REQUENA, JOHN DOE, Intervenor-Appellant. IN RE: GRAND JURY SUBPOENA FOR MIKE DEGUERIN, MIKE DEGUERIN, Appellant, and JOHN DOE, Intervenor-Appellant. IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA FOR ATTORNEY REPRESENTING CRIMINAL DEFENDANT, JOSE EVARISTO REYES-REQUENA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant
Subsequent History: [**1] Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied September 27, 1991, Reported at 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 23261.
Prior History: Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. Nos. CA-H-90-586, Misc H-89-522, Misc H 90 586; David Hittner, Judge.
Disposition: 91-2058 -- Affirmed. 90-2827 -- Dismissed. 90-2992 -- Dismissed.
district court, fee arrangement, subpoena, grand jury, confidential, contempt, confidential communication, disclosure, client privilege, motion to quash, in camera, benefactor, final decision, appeals, advice, incriminate, intertwined, anonymous, sealed, civil contempt, privileged, moot, client relationship, quashing a subpoena, ex parte hearing, legal advice, third party, inextricably, consulted, revealing
Civil Procedure, Sanctions, Contempt, Civil Contempt, Remedies, Injunctions, Contempt, General Overview, Appeals, Appellate Jurisdiction, Final Judgment Rule, Interlocutory Orders, Criminal Law & Procedure, Subpoenas, Challenges to Subpoenas, Appealability, Motions to Quash, Standards of Review, Abuse of Discretion, Discovery, Privileged Communications, Clearly Erroneous Review, Abuse of Discretion, Clearly Erroneous Review, Evidence, Privileges, Attorney-Client Privilege