Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
116 So. 3d 284 *; 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1925 **; 2013 WL 2435441
IN RE: STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS—CONTRACT AND BUSINESS CASES
Subsequent History: Related proceeding at In re: Std. Jury Instructions in Civ., Crim., Contract, & Bus. Cases-Jurors' use of Elec. Devices, 152 So. 3d 529, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 3547 (Fla., Dec. 4, 2014)
Related proceeding at In re Std. Jury Instructions in Civ. Cases & Std. Jury Instructions in Contract & Bus. Cases - Joint Report No. 18-01, 2018 Fla. LEXIS 2012 (Fla., Oct. 18, 2018)
Related proceeding at In re: Std. Jury Instructions in Contract & Bus. Cases - 2018 Report, 260 So. 3d 87, 2018 Fla. LEXIS 2388 (Fla., Dec. 6, 2018)
Related proceeding at In re Std. Jury Instructions in Civil Cases, 277 So. 3d 1007, 2019 Fla. LEXIS 1513 (Fla., Aug. 29, 2019)
Related proceeding at In re Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases-Report No. 19-02, 2019 Fla. LEXIS 2251 (Fla., Dec. 5, 2019)
claimant, parties, instructions, jurors, damages, AUTHORITIES, questions, Contracts, circumstances, cases, insert, condition precedent, modified, words, deliberations, breach of contract, standard jury instruction, affirmative defense, translation, jury room, occurrence, recommends, witnesses, lost profits, interpreter, ambiguous, answers, communicate, breached, courtroom
Counsel: [**1] Honorable Jonathan D. Gerber, Committee Chair, and Manuel Farach, Committee Vice-Chair, West Palm Beach, Florida; and Brian F. Spector, Committee Vice-Chair, Miami, Florida, for Petitioner.
Judges: LEWIS, J. POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
Opinion by: LEWIS