Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc. Local 19 v. Southwest Airlines Co.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc. Local 19 v. Southwest Airlines Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

June 22, 1989

No. 87-1085

Opinion

 [*1131]  JOLLY, Circuit Judge

This case presents the question whether the union's objection to the unilateral imposition of a comprehensive, mandatory drug testing program constitutes a "major" dispute under the Railway Labor Act that must be negotiated with the union before it can be implemented by Southwest Airlines, or whether the drug testing program was arguably justified by the existing collective bargaining agreement and hence was a "minor" dispute that must be arbitrated.

Southwest Airlines Co. ("Southwest") is a common carrier subject to the Railway Labor Act ("RLA").  [**2]  The International Brotherhood of Teamsters ("the Teamsters") represents Southwest's mechanics and related employees. Article 2, paragraph 4 of the relevant Teamsters and Southwest collective bargaining agreement provides:

Employees covered by this Agreement shall be governed by all Company rules, regulations and orders previously or hereafter issued by proper authorities of the Company which are not in conflict with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and which have been made available to the employee prior to becoming effective.

Before 1986, Southwest's drug and alcohol policy consisted mainly of Rule G, a rule of many years' standing that had been unilaterally promulgated. Its provisions defined "serious, unacceptable conduct" and included the following:

4. Reporting for or carrying on work while showing any signs of the use of intoxicants or knowingly permitting another employee to do so is strictly prohibited.

5. Possession of or drinking of any intoxicant or illegal possession or use of illegal dangerous drugs on Company premises or while in uniform and/or habitual use of intoxicants or use of illegal or dangerous drugs on or off duty will [**3]  not be tolerated.

Rule G had no significant history of enforcement; nor did Southwest have a known problem with employee use of alcohol or drugs. Nevertheless, Southwest decided to expand its drug policy. Specifically, it decided to implement a drug and alcohol testing program. The program is comprehensive and detailed. It prohibits detectable levels of illegal drugs, defined blood alcohol levels, and any level of medication that could impair performance, as well as any possession of illegal drugs. To enforce these prohibitions, the program mandates pre-employment urine drug screening, and urine drug screening of employees after accidents or if management has a reasonable suspicion of drug or alcohol use. The program establishes detailed testing procedures, and prescribes punishment, including discharge, for violations of the policy.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

875 F.2d 1129 *; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 9708 **; 131 L.R.R.M. 2761; 112 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11,338

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS OF AMERICA-AIRLINE DIVISION AND TEAMSTERS LOCAL 19, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant

Subsequent History:  [**1]   As Corrected.

Prior History: Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

CORE TERMS

bargain, management rights, unilaterally, parties, testing, injunction, disputes, waived, working conditions, terms, adjustment board, testing program, minor dispute, employees, methodology, collective bargaining agreement, cases, visual, district court, arbitration, contractual, unmistakable, urinalysis, blood alcohol, acquiescence, duty to bargain, rights, zipper, drug and alcohol, federal court

Constitutional Law, Case or Controversy, Mootness, General Overview, Business & Corporate Compliance, Labor & Employment Law, Collective Bargaining & Labor Relations, Duty to Bargain, Labor & Employment Law, Enforcement of Bargaining Agreements, Enforcement of Bargaining Agreements, Exhaustion of Remedies, Civil Procedure, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration, Bargaining Subjects, Governments, Legislation, Statutory Remedies & Rights