Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
20 N.Y.3d 1082 *; 987 N.E.2d 631 **; 965 N.Y.S.2d 71 ***; 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 504 ****; 2013 NY Slip Op 1997; 2013 WL 1195614
 Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP, Appellant, v Duane Reade, et al., Respondents.
Prior History: Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, entered August 7, 2012. The Appellate Division, with two Justices dissenting, affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Wooten, J.; op 33 Misc 3d 1209[A], 939 NYS2d 741, 2011 NY Slip Op 51821[U] ), which had dismissed the complaint.
Plaintiff law firm asserted that it was entitled to a success fee in addition to the flat $1 million fee it had already received in connection with its representation of defendant. The Appellate Division concluded that three emails exchanged by the parties constituted an unambiguous, integrated fee agreement, and that plaintiff was not entitled to a success fee under the terms of the fee agreement.
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP v Duane Reade, 98 AD3d 403, 950 NYS2d 8, affirmed.
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP. v Duane Reade, 98 AD3d 403, 950 NYS2d 8, 2012 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5824 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't, 2012)