Kean, Miller, Hawthorne, D'Armond McCowan & Jarman, L.L.P. v. Nat'l Fire Ins. Co.
United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
August 2, 2007, Decided; August 2, 2007, Filed
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-770-C-M2
Please take notice that the attached Magistrate Judge's Report has been filed with the Clerk of the United States District Court.
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), you have 10 days from the date of service of this Notice to file written objections to the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report. The failure of a party to file written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation contained in a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation within 10 days after being served with a copy of the Report shall bar that party, except upon grounds of plain error, from attacking on appeal the unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions of the Magistrate Judge that have been accepted by the [*2] District Court.
ABSOLUTELY NO EXTENSION OF TIME SHALL BE GRANTED TO FILE WRITTEN OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT.
Signed in chambers in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, August 2, 2007.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHRISTINE NOLAND
MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT
This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (R. Doc. 8) filed by plaintiff, Kean, Miller, Hawthorne, D'Armond, McCowan & Jarman, L.L.P. ("Kean Miller"). Defendant, National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford ("National Fire"), has filed an opposition (R. Doc. 21) to Kean Miller's motion, a Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (R. Doc. 18), and a Motion for Oral Argument (R. Doc. 24) relative to its motion and opposition. Kean Miller has also filed an opposition to National Fire's cross-motion.
FACTS & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUNDRead The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.
Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
2007 U . S . Dist. LEXIS 64849 *
KEAN, MILLER, HAWTHORNE, D'ARMOND MCCOWAN & JARMAN, L.L.P. VERSUS NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD
Subsequent History: Adopted by, Summary judgment granted by, Summary judgment denied by, in part, Dismissed by Kean, Miller, Hawthorne, D'Armond McCowan & Jarman, LLP v. Nat'l Fire Ins. Co., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64208 (M.D. La., Aug. 29, 2007)
civil authority, coverage, Hurricane, summary judgment, recommendations, premises, evacuation, closures, lifted, plant, insured premises, business loss, employees, streets, hotel, described premises, residents, cases, present case, advisories, prohibits, emergency, nonmoving, insured, suspend, trigger, travel, roads