Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Keystone Gas Gathering, L.L.C. v. Ad Hoc Comm. (In re Ultra Petroleum Corp.)

Keystone Gas Gathering, L.L.C. v. Ad Hoc Comm. (In re Ultra Petroleum Corp.)

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

November 26, 2019, Filed

No. 17-20793

Opinion

 [*760]  ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

ANDREW S. OLDHAM, Circuit Judge:

Treating the Appellees' and Intervenors' Joint Petition for Rehearing En Banc as a Petition for Panel Rehearing, it is GRANTED. The prior opinion, In re Ultra Petroleum Corporation, 913 F.3d 533 (5th Cir. 2019), is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted:

These bankruptcy proceedings arise from exceedingly anomalous facts. The debtors entered bankruptcy insolvent and now are solvent. That alone makes them rare. But second, the debtors accomplished their unlikely feat by virtue of a lottery-like rise in commodity prices. The combination of these anomalies makes these debtors as rare as the proverbial rich man who manages to enter the Kingdom of Heaven.

The key legal question before us is whether the rich man's creditors are "impaired" by a plan that paid them everything allowed by the Bankruptcy Code. The bankruptcy court said yes. In that court's view, a plan impairs a creditor if it refuses to pay an amount the Bankruptcy Code independently disallows. [**3]  In reaching that conclusion, the bankruptcy court split from the only court of appeals to address the question, every reported bankruptcy court decision on the question, and the leading treatise discussing the question. We reverse and follow the monolithic mountain of authority holding the Code—not the reorganization plan—defines and limits the claim in these circumstances.

Because the bankruptcy court saw things differently, it did not consider whether the Code disallows certain creditors' contractual claims for a Make-Whole Amount or post-petition interest. Instead, it ordered the debtors to pay both amounts in full. We vacate and remand those determinations for reconsideration.

Ultra Petroleum Corporation ("Petroleum") is an oil and gas exploration and production company. To be more precise, it's a holding company. Petroleum's subsidiaries—UP Energy Corporation ("Energy") and Ultra Resources, Inc. ("Resources")—do the exploring and producing. Resources took on debt to finance its operations. Between 2008 and 2010, Resources issued unsecured notes worth $1.46 billion to various noteholders. And in 2011, it borrowed another $999 million under a Revolving Credit Facility. Petroleum [**4]  and Energy guaranteed both debt obligations.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

943 F.3d 758 *; 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 35489 **; Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P83,466; 2019 WL 6318074

In re: ULTRA PETROLEUM CORPORATION; KEYSTONE GAS GATHERING, L.L.C.; ULTRA RESOURCES, INCORPORATED; ULTRA WYOMING, INCORPORATED; ULTRA WYOMING LGS, INCORPORATED; UP ENERGY CORPORATION; UPL PINEDALE, L.L.C.; UPL THREE RIVERS HOLDINGS, L.L.C., Debtors, ULTRA PETROLEUM CORPORATION; KEYSTONE GAS GATHERING, L.L.C.; ULTRA RESOURCES, INCORPORATED; ULTRA WYOMING, INCORPORATED; ULTRA WYOMING LGS, INCORPORATED; UP ENERGY CORPORATION; UPL PINEDALE, L.L.C.; UPL THREE RIVERS HOLDINGS, L.L.C., Appellants, v. AD HOC COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS OF ULTRA RESOURCES, INCORPORATED; OPCO NOTEHOLDERS, Appellees.

Prior History:  [**1] Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas.

Ultra Petroleum Corp. v. Ad Hoc Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Ultra Res., Inc. (In re Ultra Petroleum Corp.), 913 F.3d 533, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 1617 (5th Cir. Tex., Jan. 17, 2019)

CORE TERMS

impaired, bankruptcy court, Make-Whole, post-petition, disallowance, confirmation, contractual, unimpaired, reorganization plan, contractual right, equitable, repeal, rates, default, oil

Bankruptcy Law, Bankruptcy, Claims, Allowance of Claims, Reorganizations, Plans, Impairment of Claims, Types of Claims, Secured Claims & Liens, Avoidance & Survival, Judicial Review, Standards of Review, De Novo Standard of Review, Procedural Matters, Jurisdiction, Business & Corporate Compliance, Discharge & Dischargeability, Evidence, Inferences & Presumptions, Presumptions, Creation, Plan Confirmation, Prerequisites, Impaired Class Consent, Judicial Review, Governments, Courts, Judicial Precedent, Constitutional Law, Congressional Duties & Powers, Bankruptcy Clause, Procedural Matters, Rights of Secured Creditors, Bankruptcy Appeals Procedures, Standards of Review