Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Landscape Forms, Inc. v. Columbia Cascade Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

June 8, 1995, Argued ; November 13, 1995, Decided

Docket No. 95-7343

Opinion

 [***1790]   [*252]  OAKES, Senior Circuit Judge:

Columbia Cascade Company ("Columbia") appeals from an April 7, 1995, order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, John E. Sprizzo, Judge, granting a preliminary injunction prohibiting Columbia from advertising or selling a particular line of its outdoor furniture in the United States. In issuing the injunction, the district court found that Landscape Forms, Inc. ("Landscape") had shown a likelihood of success on the merits of its claim that Columbia's "Colonnade" furniture line infringed the trade dress of the "Petoskey" furniture line produced by Landscape, in [**2]  violation of § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). We find that the district court failed to consider whether the design of the Petoskey furniture was "functional" and thus not protectable trade dress, and we remand for consideration of that issue.

Background

Columbia and Landscape manufacture and sell site furnishings typically found in  [***1791]  parks, airports and large office complexes. Both companies sell these furnishings to the same markets in the United States, namely, large commercial and municipal entities. The Petoskey furniture at issue in this case was originally designed by the Beckett & Raider architectural firm for a marina in Petoskey, Michigan. An executive of Landscape saw the furniture installed at the marina, and Landscape subsequently contracted with Beckett & Raider to help design and develop the Petoskey Collection, which Landscape introduced in the fall of 1989.

The Petoskey furniture has a modern appearance. It is made of three-inch metal tubing which is bent to form the legs and the support for the furniture. The most notable pieces in the collection are the benches, which are shaped and curved to fit the human form and which are supported on only [**3]  two or three legs, giving them the appearance of being suspended in air.

In the late spring of 1993, Columbia's sales department reported to management that there was considerable interest in the style of furniture offered only by Landscape in its Petoskey line. Columbia's customers evidently asked its sales representatives if Columbia could produce similar-looking furniture at a competitive price. In response, Columbia designed its Colonnade line, which emulated the design of the Petoskey furniture. Columbia began marketing the line in industry trade catalogs and through its brochures in early 1994.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

70 F.3d 251 *; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 31943 **; 36 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1790 ***

Landscape Forms, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Columbia Cascade Company, Defendant-Appellant.

Prior History:  [**1]  Columbia Cascade Company appeals from a preliminary injunction prohibiting it from advertising or selling a particular line of its outdoor furniture in the United States.

Disposition: Vacated and remanded.

CORE TERMS

furniture, Landscape, trade dress, district court, functionality, preliminary injunction, proceedings, trademark, benches, designs

Business & Corporate Compliance, Entertainment Industry Falsity & Performance Misattribution, Trade Dress Protection, Causes of Action, Trademark Law, Causes of Action Involving Trademarks, Infringement Actions, Burdens of Proof, Federal Unfair Competition Law, False Advertising, General Overview, False Designation of Origin, Elements of False Designation of Origin, Subject Matter of Trademarks, Labels, Packaging & Trade Dress, Terms Requiring Secondary Meaning, Defenses