Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Larson v. Allina Health Sys.

Larson v. Allina Health Sys.

United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

October 1, 2018, Decided; October 1, 2018, Filed

Case No. 17-cv-03835 (SRN/SER)

Opinion

 [*788]  MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court on Allina Health System, Allina Health System Board of Directors, Allina Health System Retirement Committee, Allina Health System Chief Administrative Officer, Allina Health System Chief Human Resources Officer, Clay Ahrens, John I. Allen, Jennifer Alstad, Gary Bhojwani, Barbara Butts-Williams, John R. Church, Laura Gillund, Joseph Goswitz, Greg Heinemann, David Kuplic, Hugh T. Nierengarten, Sahra Noor, Brian Rosenberg, Debbra L. Schoneman, Thomas S. Schreier, Jr., Abir Sen, Sally J. Smith, Darrell Tukua, Penny Wheeler, Duncan Gallagher, Christine Webster Moore, Kristyn Mullin, Steve Wallner, John T. Knight, and John Does 1-20's (collectively "Defendants'") Motion to Dismiss the Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss") [Doc. No. 28] for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim. For the reasons stated [**3]  below, the Court will partially grant and partially deny the motion.

II. BACKGROUND

A. Factual History

Defendant Allina Health System ("Allina") is a health care system that provides medical care throughout Minnesota and western Wisconsin. (Compl. ¶ 21.) Qualifying Allina employees were covered by the Allina retirement plan. Allina previously offered a 403(b) Plan to its employees. (Id. ¶ 84.) However, in October 2010, new participant entry into the 403(b) Plan was frozen, and by January 1, 2011, all employee salary deferrals, employer matching contributions, and discretionary employer contributions were frozen. (Id. ¶ 84.) In conjunction with freezing the 403(b) Plan, effective January 1, 2012, all eligible Allina employees became participants in the 401(k) Plan. (Id.) Since that time, all deferral elections and employer contributions have been received within the 401(k) Plan. (Id. ¶ 88.)

Both the 403(b) and 401(k) Plans are "defined contribution plans" or "individual account" plans within the meaning of ERISA § 3(34), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(34). (Id. ¶ 4.) Therefore, each Plan contains individual accounts for every participant and for benefits based solely upon the amount contributed to those accounts. (Id. ¶ 83.) The retirement [**4]  benefits each Plan provides are based solely on the amounts allocated to an individual's account. (Id.)

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

350 F. Supp. 3d 780 *; 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170226 **; 2018 WL 4700332

Judy Larson, Janelle Mausolf, and Karen Reese, individually and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Allina Health System; the Allina Health System Board of Directors; the Allina Health System Retirement Committee; the Allina Health System Chief Administrative Officer; the Allina Health System Chief Human Resources Officer; Clay Ahrens; John I. Allen; Jennifer Alstad; Gary Bhojwani; Barbara Butts-Williams; John R. Church; Laura Gillund; Joseph Goswitz; Greg Heinemann; David Kuplic; Hugh T. Nierengarten; Sahra Noor; Brian Rosenberg; Debbra L. Schoneman; Thomas S. Schreier, Jr.; Abir Sen; Sally J. Smith; Darrell Tukua; Penny Wheeler; Duncan Gallagher; Christine Webster Moore; Kristyn Mullin; Steve Wallner; John T. Knight; and John Does 1-20, Defendants.

Subsequent History: Later proceeding at Larson v. Allina Health Sys., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20574 (D. Minn., Feb. 4, 2019)

Settled by, Dismissed by, in part Larson v. Allina Health Sys., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206067 (D. Minn., Nov. 21, 2019)

Motion denied by, Motion denied by, As moot Larson v. Allina Health Sys., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20378 (D. Minn., Feb. 6, 2020)

Settled by, Dismissed by, Without prejudice, Motion granted by Larson v. Allina Health Sys., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90400 (D. Minn., May 22, 2020)

Costs and fees proceeding at, Motion granted by Larson v. Allina Health Sys., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90403 (D. Minn., May 22, 2020)

CORE TERMS

fiduciary, options, mutual fund, funds, window, fiduciary duty, breached, recordkeeping, breach of fiduciary duty, Plans, motion to dismiss, monitor, disclosures, pled, fail to state a claim, revenue sharing, offering, prudent, loyalty, trusts, money market fund, separate account, allegations, invest, inclusion, managed, Retirement, selecting, contributions, imprudence