Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Lohan v Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.

Lohan v Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.

Court of Appeals of New York

 February 7, 2018, Argued; March 29, 2018, Decided

No. 24

Opinion

 [***782]  [*117]  [**391]    Fahey, J.

The primary questions on this appeal are whether ] an avatar (that is, a graphical representation of a person, in a video game or like media) may constitute a "portrait" within the meaning of Civil Rights Law §§ 50 and 51 and, if so, whether the images in question in the video game central to this matter are recognizable as plaintiff. We conclude a computer generated image may constitute a portrait within the meaning of that law. We also conclude, however, that the subject images are not recognizable as plaintiff, and that the amended complaint, which contains four causes of action for violation of privacy pursuant to Civil Rights Law §§ 50 and 51, was properly dismissed.

Facts1

Defendants develop, sell, market, and distribute [****2]  video games, including the commercially successful "Grand Theft Auto V" (GTAV) game. GTAV is an action-adventure game that is set in a fictional state called "San Andreas" that, according to the vice-president for quality assurance of defendant Rockstar Games, Inc. (Rockstar), is intended to evoke Southern California. GTAV's plot occurs in and around a fictional city called "Los Santos," which in turn is intended to evoke Los Angeles. In addition to a 50-hour principal storyline, GTAV contains approximately 100 hours of supplementary game play containing "random events" that a player may choose to explore as he or she proceeds through the game's main plot.

One of those random events is relevant to this appeal. In what defendants characterize as the "Escape Paparazzi" scene in GTAV, the player encounters a character named "Lacey Jonas" hiding from paparazzi in an alley. To the extent the player chooses to help her escape those photographers, Jonas enters the player's automobile before describing herself as an "actress slash singer" and the "voice of a generation." Jonas also characterizes herself as "really famous," and the player's character recognizes "that Jonas has [**392]   [***783]  starred in romantic [****3]  comedies and a cheerleader dance-off movie."

 [*118]  Before the GTAV storyline may proceed to any random events, including the "Escape Paparazzi" scene, the player must view what defendants refer to as "transition screens," which "contain artwork that appears briefly on the user's screen while the game content [loads] into the game console's memory." Two "screens" from GTAV are relevant to this appeal. One such screen contains an image (the "Stop and Frisk" image) of a blonde woman who is clad in denim shorts, a fedora, necklaces, large sunglasses, and a white T-shirt while being frisked by a female police officer. The second such screen contains an image (the "Beach Weather" image) wherein the same blonde woman is depicted wearing a red bikini and bracelets, taking a "selfie" with her cell phone, and displaying the peace sign with one of her hands.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

31 N.Y.3d 111 *; 97 N.E.3d 389 **; 73 N.Y.S.3d 780 ***; 2018 N.Y. LEXIS 721 ****; 2018 NY Slip Op 02208; 2018 WL 1524714

 [1]  Lindsay Lohan, Appellant, v Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Prior History: Appeal, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, entered September 1, 2016. The Appellate Division order, insofar as appealed from, modified, on the law, an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.; op 2016 NY Slip Op 32866[U] [2016]), which had denied defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint and for sanctions. The modification consisted of granting the part of defendants' motion seeking to dismiss the amended complaint.

Gravano v Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., 142 AD3d 776, 37 NYS3d 20, 2016 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5819, 2016 NY Slip Op 5942 (Sept. 1, 2016), affirmed.

CORE TERMS

portrait, privacy, recognizable, photograph, images, video game, amended complaint, advertising, likeness, picture, avatar, player, Frisk, screen, woman

Torts, Invasion of Privacy, Appropriation, Elements, Civil Procedure, Defenses, Demurrers & Objections, Motions to Dismiss, Failure to State Claim, Pleadings, Complaints, Requirements for Complaint, Appeals, Standards of Review, Questions of Fact & Law, Remedies, Constitutional Law, Fundamental Freedoms, Freedom of Speech, Commercial Speech, Scope, Governments, Legislation, Interpretation, State & Territorial Governments, Legislatures, Trials, Jury Trials, Province of Court & Jury