Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
823 F.3d 948 *; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 15202 **
GEOFFREY MOYLE, an individual, on behalf of themselves; PAULINE ARWOOD, an individual, on behalf of themselves; THOMAS ROLLASON, an individual, on behalf of themselves; JEANNIE SANDERS, an individual, on behalf of themselves, Plaintiffs-Appellants/ Cross-Appellees, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN; LIBERTY MUTUAL RETIREMENT PLAN RETIREMENT BOARD; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts company; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE GROUP INC., a Massachusetts company, Defendants-Appellees/ Cross-Appellants.
Prior History: [**1] Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. D.C. No. 3:10-cv-02179-GPC-MDD. Gonzalo P. Curiel, District Judge, Presiding.
Moyle v. Liberty Mut. Ret. Ben. Plan, 823 F.3d 948, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9251 (9th Cir. Cal., May 20, 2016)
Disposition: AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part; REMANDED. Each side to bear its own costs.
benefits, retirement plan, employees, past services, district court, accrual, class certification, eligibility, reformation, terms, equitable remedy, fiduciary, equitable relief, cases, bid, vesting, conflicting interest, summary judgment, meetings, retirement benefits, terms of the plan, early retirement, Affiliated, enrollment, employment service, seek relief, representations, provisions, violations, surcharge
Pensions & Benefits Law, Civil Litigation, Causes of Action, Suits to Recover Plan Benefits, Judicial Review, Standards of Review, Conflict of Interest Analysis, De Novo Standard of Review, Abuse of Discretion, Remedies, Equitable Relief, Governments, Courts, Judicial Precedent, Civil Procedure, Pleadings, Complaints, Requirements for Complaint, Disclosure, Notice & Reporting, Required Reports, Summary Plan Descriptions, Special Proceedings, Class Actions, Appellate Review, Prerequisites for Class Action, Prerequisites for Class Action, Commonality, Typicality