Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Namugisha v. Avera McKennan Hosp.

Namugisha v. Avera McKennan Hosp.

United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, Southern Division

February 19, 2021, Decided; February 19, 2021, Filed

4:19-CV-04087-LLP

Opinion

ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO QUASH OR FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

Docket No. 38

INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the court on the amended complaint alleging medical negligence and other claims by plaintiffs Jeanne Namugisha and Innocent Cyubahiro, individually and as parents of N.C., their minor child. The claims arise out of the July 31-August 1, 2017, labor and delivery of N.C. by Jeanne. Jurisdiction is premised on the diverse citizenship of the parties [*2] 1 and an amount in controversy in excess of $75,000. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

Although numerous defendants were initially named in the plaintiffs' complaint (see Docket No. 1), by agreement of the parties only Avera McKennan Hospital remains a named defendant, the other defendants having been dismissed without prejudice. See Docket No. 15. Now pending is defendant's motion to quash a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition served on it by plaintiffs or, in the alternative, for a protective order regarding that deposition notice. The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, district judge, referred the defendant's motion to this magistrate judge for a decision pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and the October 16, 2014, standing order of the Honorable Karen E. Schreier, district judge.

FACTS

The facts pertinent to the instant motion are taken for the most part from plaintiffs' amended complaint. Docket No. 3. The court intends to imply no imprimatur of veracity reciting facts from that document. Rather, the facts are intended to flesh out what the claims and, in so far as is relevant, defenses in this lawsuit are so as to evaluate the parties' arguments regarding the discovery requested.

Plaintiffs' overarching theory is that a "complete system failure" at the hospital [*3]  occurred whereby Jeanne and N.C. were not monitored or attended to adequately such that N.C. was deprived of oxygen for hours while her umbilical cord was wrapped around his body and neck during labor.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31267 *; 2021 WL 664906

JEANNE NAMUGISHA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NATURAL PARENTS AND GUARDIANS OF N.C., A MINOR; AND INNOCENT CYUBAHIRO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NATURAL PARENTS AND GUARDIANS OF N.C., A MINOR; Plaintiffs, vs. AVERA MCKENNAN HOSPITAL, Defendant.

CORE TERMS

subject area, plaintiffs', discovery, deponent, policies, monitoring, labor and delivery, alarms, clinic, trails, audit, peer review, designate, retaining, alerts, person responsible, deposition, healthcare provider, parameters, inquire, deposition notice, communications, burdensome, delivery, purging, notice, documents, patient, claim of privilege, electronic