Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
933 F.3d 1136 *; 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 24041 **; 2019-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P80,870; 2019 WL 3788253
IN RE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE'S SUNDAY TICKET ANTITRUST LITIGATION,NINTH INNING, INC., DBA The Mucky Duck; 1465 THIRD AVENUE RESTAURANT CORP., DBA Gael Pub; ROBERT GARY LIPPINCOTT, JR.; MICHAEL HOLINKO, an individual, for himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DIRECTV, LLC; DIRECTV HOLDINGS, LLC; NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.; NFL ENTERPRISES, LLC; ARIZONA CARDINALS, INC.; ATLANTA FALCONS FOOTBALL CLUB LLC; BALTIMORE RAVENS, LP; BUFFALO BILLS, INC.; PANTHERS FOOTBALL, LLC; CHICAGO BEARS FOOTBALL CLUB, INC.; CINCINNATI BENGALS, INC.; CLEVELAND BROWNS, LLC; DALLAS COWBOYS FOOTBALL CLUB, LTD.; DETROIT LIONS, INC.; GREEN BAY PACKERS, INC.; HOUSTON NFL HOLDINGS, LP; INDIANAPOLIS COLTS, INC.; JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS, LTD.; KANSAS CITY CHIEFS FOOTBALL CLUB, INC.; MIAMI DOLPHINS, LTD.; MINNESOTA VIKINGS FOOTBALL CLUB, LLC; NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS, LP; NEW ORLEANS LOUISIANA SAINTS, LLC; NEW YORK FOOTBALL GIANTS, INC.; NEW YORK JETS FOOTBALL CLUB, INC.; OAKLAND RAIDERS, LP; PHILADELPHIA EAGLES FOOTBALL CLUB, INC.; PITTSBURGH STEELERS SPORTS, INC.; SAN DIEGO CHARGERS FOOTBALL CO.; SAN FRANCISCO FORTY NINERS, LTD.; THE RAMS FOOTBALL COMPANY, LLC; BUCCANEERS, LP; TENNESSEE FOOTBALL, INC.; WASHINGTON FOOTBALL, INC.; FOOTBALL NORTHWEST LLC; DENVER BRONCOS FOOTBALL CLUB, Defendants-Appellees.
Subsequent History: Counsel Amended August 15, 2019.
Later proceeding at Ninth Inning, Inc. v. DirecTV, LLC (In re NFL Sunday Ticket Antitrust Litig.), 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 26606 (9th Cir. Cal., Sept. 3, 2019)
Rehearing denied by, En banc Ninth Inning Inc. v. DirecTV (In re NFLs Sunday Ticket Antitrust Litig.), 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 30400 (9th Cir. Cal., Oct. 10, 2019)
Stay granted by In re NFL Sunday Ticket Antitrust Litig., 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 30822 (9th Cir. Cal., Oct. 16, 2019)
Petition for certiorari filed at, 02/07/2020
Motion granted by NFL v. Ninth Inning, Inc., 2020 U.S. LEXIS 1522 (U.S., Mar. 9, 2020)
Prior History: [**1] Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Beverly. D.C. No. 2:15-ml-02668-BRO-JEM. Reid O'Connell, District Judge, Presiding.
In re NFL Sunday Ticket Antitrust Litig., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121354 (C.D. Cal., June 30, 2017)
telecasts, teams, games, television, conspiracy, broadcast, rights, output, league, antitrust, consumer, purchaser, football, sports, alleges, interlocking, conspired, network, defendants', monopolize, professional football, price-fixing, plaintiffs', horizontal, co-conspirator, competitors, subscribers, satellite, compete, cable
Civil Procedure, Appeals, Standards of Review, De Novo Review, Defenses, Demurrers & Objections, Motions to Dismiss, Failure to State Claim, Antitrust & Trade Law, Sherman Act, Claims, Scope, Monopolization Offenses, Monopolies & Monopolization, Conspiracy to Monopolize, Sherman Act, Price Fixing & Restraints of Trade, Per Se Rule & Rule of Reason, Per Se Violations, Cartels & Horizontal Restraints, Vertical Restraints, Nonprice Restraints, Copyright Law, Scope of Copyright Protection, Subject Matter, Specific Subject Matter, Ownership Interests, Initial Ownership, Elements