Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
138 S. Ct. 2361 *; 201 L. Ed. 2d 835 **; 2018 U.S. LEXIS 4025 ***; 86 U.S.L.W. 4627; 27 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 524; 2018 WL 3116336
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FAMILY AND LIFE ADVOCATES, dba NIFLA, et al., Petitioners v. XAVIER BECERRA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, et al.
Notice: The LEXIS pagination of this document is subject to change pending release of the final published version.
Prior History: [***1] ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nat'l Inst. of Family & Life Advocates v. Harris, 839 F.3d 823, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 18515 (9th Cir. Cal., Oct. 14, 2016)
Disposition: 839 F. 3d 823, reversed and remanded.
licensed, notice, abortion, disclosure, clinics, unlicensed, pregnancy, patients, advertising, prenatal, woman, childbirth, exempt, contraception, message, content-based, viewpoint, pregnant, medicine, burdensome, pregnancy-related, enroll, pro-life, crisis, unduly, uncontroversial, Reproductive, disclaimer, heightened, low-income
Constitutional Law, Bill of Rights, Fundamental Freedoms, Judicial & Legislative Restraints, Freedom of Speech, Scope, State Application, Commercial Speech, Expressive Conduct, Torts, Malpractice & Professional Liability, Healthcare Law, Medical Treatment, Reproductive Services, Evidence, Burdens of Proof, Allocation