Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

NLRB v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

NLRB v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 29, 1956, Argued ; May 7, 1956, Decided

No. 486

Opinion

 [*149]   [**754]   [***1030]  MR. JUSTICE BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

] The National Labor Relations Act [****2]  makes it an unfair labor practice for an employer to refuse to bargain in good faith with the representative of his employees. 1  [*150]  The question presented by this case is whether the National Labor Relations Board may find that an employer has not bargained in good faith where the employer claims it cannot afford to pay higher wages but refuses requests to produce information substantiating its claim.

 [****3]  The dispute here arose when a union representing certain of respondent's employees asked for a wage increase of 10 cents per hour. The company answered that it could  [***1031]  not afford to pay such an increase, it was undercapitalized, had never paid dividends, and that an increase of more than 2 1/2 cents per hour would put it out of business. The union asked the company to produce some evidence substantiating these statements, requesting permission to have a certified public accountant examine the company's books, financial data, etc. This request being denied, the union asked that the company submit "full and complete information with respect to its financial standing and profits," insisting that such information was pertinent and essential for the employees to determine whether or not they should continue to press their demand for a wage increase. A union official testified before the trial examiner that "We were wanting anything relating to the Company's position, any records or what have you, books, accounting sheets, cost expenditures, what not, anything to back the Company's position that they were unable to give any more money." The company refused all the requests,  [****4]  relying solely on the statement that "the information . . . is not pertinent to  [*151]  this discussion and the company declines to give you such information; You have no legal right to such."

 [**755]  On the basis of these facts the National Labor Relations Board found that the company had "failed to bargain in good faith with respect to wages in violation of Section 8 (a)(5) of the Act." 110 N. L. R. B. 856. The Board ordered the company to supply the union with such information as would "substantiate the Respondent's position of its economic inability to pay the requested wage increase." The Court of Appeals refused to enforce the Board's order, agreeing with respondent that it could not be held guilty of an unfair labor practice because of its refusal to furnish the information requested by the union. 224 F.2d 869. In Labor Board v. Jacobs Mfg. Co., 196 F.2d 680, the Second Circuit upheld a Board finding of bad-faith bargaining based on an employer's refusal to supply financial information under circumstances similar to those here. Because of the conflict and the importance of the question we granted certiorari. 350 U.S. 922.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

351 U.S. 149 *; 76 S. Ct. 753 **; 100 L. Ed. 1027 ***; 1956 U.S. LEXIS 1717 ****; 30 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P69,932; 38 L.R.R.M. 2042

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. TRUITT MANUFACTURING CO.

Prior History:  [****1]  CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.

Disposition:  224 F.2d 869, reversed.

CORE TERMS

bargaining, good faith, wages, employees, substantiate, unfair labor practice, wage increase, negotiation, Relations

Labor & Employment Law, Unfair Labor Practices, Union Violations, Union Refusal to Bargain, Collective Bargaining & Labor Relations, General Overview, Business & Corporate Compliance, Labor & Employment Law, Duty to Bargain, Administrative Law, Judicial Review, Reviewability, Questions of Law