Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Okla. Police Pension & Ret. Sys. v. Sterling Bancorp

Okla. Police Pension & Ret. Sys. v. Sterling Bancorp

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

April 28, 2021, Decided; April 28, 2021, Filed

Case 5:20-cv-10490-JEL-EAS

Opinion

CLASS ACTION

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT [*3]  AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

WHEREAS a consolidated class action is currently pending before the Court entitled Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System, et al. v. Sterling Bancorp, Inc., et al., Case No. 5:20-cv-10490-JEL-EAS (the "Action");

WHEREAS, the Court has received Lead Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Proposed Class Action Settlement (the "Preliminary Approval Motion") and the Stipulation of Settlement, dated April 16, 2021 (the "Stipulation"), that was entered into by Lead Plaintiff Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System ("Lead Plaintiff"), Defendants Sterling Bancorp, Inc. ("Sterling" or the "Company"), Gary Judd, Thomas Lopp, Michael Montemayor, Scott Seligman, Barry Allen, Jon Fox, Seth Meltzer, Sandra Seligman, Peter Sinatra, Benjamin Wineman, Lyle Wolberg, Piper Sandler Companies, and American Capital Partners, LLC (collectively "Defendants"), and the Court has reviewed the Stipulation and its attached Exhibits;

WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiff having made the Preliminary Approval Motion, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(e), for an order preliminarily approving the settlement of this Action, in accordance with the Stipulation which, together with the exhibits annexed thereto, [*4]  sets forth the terms and conditions for a proposed Settlement of the Action and for dismissal of the Action with prejudice upon the terms and conditions set forth therein; and

WHEREAS, all defined terms contained herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. For purposes of this Settlement only, the Court will certify a Settlement Class defined as all Persons who purchased or otherwise acquired Sterling common stock during the Settlement Class Period, November 17, 2017 through and including March 17, 2020, including shares sold in the initial public offering that commenced on November 17, 2017, and were damaged as a result. Excluded from the Class are Defendants herein; members of the immediate family of each of the Defendants; any person, firm, trust, corporation, officer, director, or other individual or entity in which any Defendant has a controlling interest or which is related to or affiliated with any of the Defendants, including trusts associated with members of the Founding Family and the selling shareholders; and the legal representatives, agents, affiliates, heirs, successors-in-interest, or assigns of any such [*5]  excluded party.

Also excluded from the Settlement Class are any Persons who otherwise satisfy the above requirements for membership in the Settlement Class, but who exclude themselves by submitting a valid request for exclusion in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Notice.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80825 *

OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. STERLING BANCORP, INC.; GARY JUDD; THOMAS LOPP; MICHAEL MONTEMAYOR; SCOTT SELIGMAN; BARRY ALLEN; JON FOX; SETH MELTZER; SANDRA SELIGMAN; PETER SINATRA; BENJAMIN WINEMAN; LYLE WOLBERG; PIPER SANDLER COMPANIES; AND AMERICAN CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, Defendants.

CORE TERMS

Settlement, Notice, final approval, expenses, common stock, proposed settlement, attorney's fees, class action, reimbursement, approve, calendar days, beneficial, satisfying, Exhibits, mail