Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Okoli v. City of Baltimore

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

March 22, 2011, Argued; August 8, 2011, Decided

No. 08-2198

Opinion

 [*217]  GREGORY, Circuit Judge:

Appellant challenges the grant of summary judgment for her employer when her boss forcibly kissed her, fondled her leg, propositioned her, asked sexually explicit questions, described sexual activities he wished to perform, and then, after she spurned the advances and filed a harassment complaint, fired her. Because those allegations are sufficient to make out claims of hostile work environment, quid pro quo harassment, and  [**2] retaliation, we vacate and remand.

We recite the facts, with reasonable inferences drawn, in favor of the non-movant, Katrina Okoli (Appellant-Plaintiff). See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S. Ct. 2505, 91 L. Ed. 2d 202 (1986).

John P. Stewart is the director of Baltimore's Commission on Aging and Retirement ("CARE") and serves in the Mayor's cabinet. On June 21, 2004, Stewart hired Okoli, an African-American woman, to serve as his executive assistant. The parties agree that for the first few months, Stewart and Okoli worked well together.

Beginning in September 2004, things changed for the worse: Namely, Stewart began propositioning Okoli to have sex with him in a Jacuzzi as part of his sexual fantasy. He first did so on September 13, 2004, during a visit to a CARE facility.1 During a September 24, 2004 work meeting, Stewart then asked Okoli whether she was wearing any underwear, what color it was, and whether she would come to work the next day without underwear. Next, on October 4, 2004, Stewart told Okoli about a sexual experience he had with an African-American woman and her daughter. Okoli reacted with shock and disgust, which  [*218]  Stewart noticed. Another  [**3] time, Stewart again mentioned this sexual experience with a mother and daughter. Okoli reiterated that the daughter would despise and regret having such a lewd sexual encounter with her mother. Stewart laughed it off and returned to work, as Okoli suggests he often did.

Stewart continued to proposition Okoli about his Jacuzzi fantasy, and on November 10, 2004, asked her to sit on his lap and to join him in a Jacuzzi in Las Vegas. Whenever Stewart traveled, he continued to request Okoli to join him in his Jacuzzi, and became angry when she rejected his advances. Furthermore, Stewart touched Okoli's  [**4] legs under the conference table "two or three times" during their morning meetings. J.A. 17B, 105-06, 319-20. Whenever this occurred, Okoli would move away from Stewart and tell him "don't do that." J.A. 17B. In November 2004, Okoli met with a manager about transferring to another department, and in January, Stewart gave her an "informal" performance review with areas of suggested improvement. J.A. 71-72.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

648 F.3d 216 *; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16356 **; 112 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1675; 94 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P44,241

KATRINA OKOLI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF BALTIMORE, Defendant-Appellee, and JOHN P. STEWART, Executive Director; MARTIN O'MALLEY, Mayor; MICHAEL R. ENRIGHT, 1st Deputy Mayor; COLM O'COMARTUN, Special Assistant; COMMISSION ON AGING & RETIREMENT ED. (CARE); MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, Defendants.

Subsequent History: On remand at, Motion for new trial denied by, Motion denied by Okoli v. Mayor of Baltimore, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89715 (D. Md., June 28, 2012)

Prior History:  [**1] Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-03025-WMN).

Okoli v. City of Balt., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104556 (D. Md., May 3, 2007)

Disposition: VACATED AND REMANDED.

CORE TERMS

harassment, termination, sexual, sexual harassment, fired, quid pro quo, hostile work environment, summary judgment, retaliation, allegations, severe, reasons, sexual advances, district court, tangible, protected activity, employment action, sex, light most favorable, proffered reason, conditions, advances, comments, fantasy, hostile, work environment, complaining, demands, emailed, pretext

Civil Procedure, Appeals, Standards of Review, De Novo Review, Summary Judgment Review, Standards of Review, Labor & Employment Law, Sexual Harassment, Burdens of Proof, Employee Burdens of Proof, Harassment, Racial Harassment, Hostile Work Environment, General Overview, Quid Pro Quo, Burden Shifting, Evidence, Retaliation, Elements, Business & Corporate Compliance, Correction & Prevention