Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
8 Cal. 5th 111 *; 447 P.3d 680 **; 251 Cal. Rptr. 3d 714 ***; 2019 Cal. LEXIS 6241 ****; 170 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P61,989; 2019 WL 4065524
OTO, L.L.C., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. KEN KHO, Defendant and Respondent; JULIE A. SU, as Labor Commissioner, etc., Intervener and Appellant.
Subsequent History: Reported at Oto, L.L.C. v. Kho; Su, 2019 Cal. LEXIS 6608 (Cal., Aug. 29, 2019)
US Supreme Court certiorari denied by Oto v. Kho, 2020 U.S. LEXIS 3049 (U.S., June 8, 2020)
Prior History: [****1] Superior Court of Alameda County, No. RG15781961, Evelio M. Grillo, Judge. First Appellate District, Division One, No. A147564.
OTO, L.L.C. v. Kho, 14 Cal. App. 5th 691, 222 Cal. Rptr. 3d 506, 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 723 (Aug. 21, 2017)
arbitration, unconscionability, unfair, claimants, bargain, novo, oppressive, invalidate, adhesion, unenforceable, one-sided, italics, vacate, preempted, unpaid, prevailing, saving, discovery, harsh, inaccessible, unaffordable, crafted, speedy, formation, mandatory, prolixity, surrender, sentence, block, litigation-like
Business & Corporate Compliance, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration, Arbitrability, Federal Arbitration Act, Arbitration Agreements, Contracts Law, Defenses, Unconscionability, Unconscionability, Pretrial Matters, Judicial Review, Civil Procedure, Appeals, Standards of Review, De Novo Review, Validity of ADR Methods, Adhesion Contracts, Labor & Employment Law, Conditions & Terms, Arbitration Provisions, Enforcement, Wage & Hour Laws, Administrative Proceedings, Enforcement Provisions, Administrative Law, Judicial Review, Remedies, Mandamus, Writs, Common Law Writs, Justiciability, Exhaustion of Remedies, Administrative Remedies