Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

Qualcomm Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Qualcomm Inc. v. Apple Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

June 17, 2022, Decided

2020-1558, 2020-1559

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Per Curiam.

ORDER

Apple Inc. filed a petition for rehearing en banc. The court invited responses to the petition which were separately filed by Qualcomm Incorporated and Katherine K. Vidal. The petition was first referred as a petition for rehearing to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc was referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

The petition for panel rehearing is denied.

The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

The mandate of the court will issue on June 24, 2022.

MANDATE

In accordance with the judgment of this Court, entered February 1, 2022, and pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the formal mandate is hereby issued.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 18157 *; 2022 WL 2339478

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Appellant v. APPLE INC., Appellee, KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor

Notice: THIS DECISION WAS ISSUED AS UNPUBLISHED OR NONPRECEDENTIAL AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENT. PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.

Prior History:  [*1] Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2018-01315, IPR2018-01316.

Qualcomm Inc. v. Apple Inc., 24 F.4th 1367, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 2836 (Fed. Cir., Feb. 1, 2022)

CORE TERMS

petition for rehearing, en banc