Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Ramos v. Banner Health

Ramos v. Banner Health

United States District Court for the District of Colorado

May 20, 2020, Decided; May 20, 2020, Filed

Civil Action No. 15-cv-2556-WJM-NRN

Opinion

 [*1078]  FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ENTERED UPON TRIAL ON THE MERITS TO THE COURT

Plaintiffs Lorraine M. Ramos and others ("Plaintiffs") bring this class action against Banner Health ("Banner"), as well as current and former employees of Banner Health (together, "Banner Defendants"), alleging that Banner Defendants breached their fiduciary duties related to the Banner Health Employees 401(k) Plan ("Plan") under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. Plaintiffs allege that Banner Defendants, fiduciaries of the Plan, violated various provisions of ERISA by failing to prudently monitor certain Plan offerings, retaining certain investment options for too long, using a revenue [**3]  sharing model to pay for recordkeeping services which resulted in the paying of excessive recordkeeping fees and allegedly improper payments, and impermissibly using Plan assets to pay certain Banner expenses.

Plaintiffs sought and obtained class certification with respect to their claims against Banner Defendants. ECF No. 296. The Court certified the following class: "All participants and beneficiaries of the Banner Health Employees 401(k) Plan from November 20, 2009 through the date of judgment, excluding the Defendants." Id. at 25-26, 31. The class period runs from the date this action was filed, November 20, 2009, through the date of judgment ("Class Period").

On January 6, 2020, the case proceeded to an eight-day bench trial before the undersigned on the following claims:

• Breach of the duties of prudence and loyalty by offering and failing to monitor allegedly imprudent investment  [*1079]  options accessible to those who participated in the Plan via a Mutual Fund Window, 29 U.S.C. § 1104 (Count II);1

• Breach of the duties of prudence and loyalty by retaining the Fidelity Freedom Funds after they allegedly became an imprudent investment option, 29 U.S.C. § 1104 (Count II);

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

461 F. Supp. 3d 1067 *; 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88639 **; 2020 WL 2553705

LORRAINE M. RAMOS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BANNER HEALTH, et al., Defendants.

Subsequent History: Affirmed by Ramos v. Banner Health, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 17447 (10th Cir. Colo., June 11, 2021)

Prior History: Ramos v. Banner Health, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161686 (D. Colo., Sept. 29, 2017)

CORE TERMS

Funds, fiduciary, recordkeeping, mutual fund, Window, options, calculated, monitor, losses, expenses, administrative fees, plan participant, revenue sharing, Block, prudent, plans, per-participant, damages, target date, prohibited transaction, reimbursement, class period, estimate, benchmark, returns, credits, breach of duty, quarterly, costs, Fine