Richardson v. Rock City Mech. Co., LLC

Richardson v. Rock City Mech. Co., LLC

Opinion

ORDER

As provided herein, the defendant's motion to compel (Docket Entry No. 41) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the defendant's motion for protective order (Docket Entry No. 43) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the defendant's motions for leave to file replies (Docket Entry Nos. 47 and 48) are GRANTED; the defendant's second motion for protective order (Docket Entry No. 50) is DENIED; the defendant's third motion for protective order (Docket Entry No. 52) is DENIED; the plaintiff's motion to compel and to impose other remedies (Docket Entry No. 54) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and the plaintiff's motion to allow document to be manually filed (Docket  [*2] Entry No. 57) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

The Clerk is directed to file and docket the defendant's reply with attached exhibit (Docket Entry Nos. 47-2 and 47-3), which is in reply to the plaintiff's response (Docket Entry No. 45) to the defendant's motion to compel (Docket Entry No. 41).

The Clerk is also directed to file and docket the defendant's reply (Docket Entry No. 48-3), which is in reply to the plaintiff's response (Docket Entry No. 46) to the defendant's first motion for a protective order (Docket Entry No. 43).

The Court will make the CD of the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of the defendant part of the record. However, in addition, the plaintiff shall e-file the transcript. Although the plaintiff indicated that it is "too lengthy for electronic filing," and it may, in fact, be too lengthy for a single entry, the 54 pages of transcripts can be filed in two electronic filings.

1. Defendant's Motion to Compel (Docket Entry No. 41)

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.