Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
13 N.Y.3d 270 *; 918 N.E.2d 900 **; 890 N.Y.S.2d 388 ***; 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 3953 ****; 2009 NY Slip Op 7480
 Amy L. Roberts et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Respondents, v Tishman Speyer Properties, L.P., et al., Appellants.
Subsequent History: Subsequent appeal at Roberts v. Tishman Speyer Props., L.P., 2011 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't, Nov. 3, 2011)
Prior History: Appeal, by permission of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, from an order of that Court, entered March 5, 2009. The Appellate Division (1) reversed, on the law, a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard B. Lowe, III, J.; op 2007 NY Slip Op 32639[U]), which had granted motions by defendants to dismiss the complaint and dismissed the complaint; and (2) reinstated the complaint. The following question was certified by the Appellate Division: "Was the order of this Court, which reversed the order of the Supreme Court, properly made?"
Roberts v. Tishman Speyer Props., L.P., 62 A.D.3d 71, 874 N.Y.S.2d 97, 2009 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1545 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't, 2009)
Disposition: [****1] Order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative.
decontrol, benefits, luxury, tax benefit, rent-stabilized, rent, apartments, properties, regulations, provisions, defendants', tenants, words, deregulation, rent stabilization, Stabilization, exempt, rent regulation, apartment complex, tax exemption, abatements, dwelling, HPD, statutory interpretation, housing accommodation, statutory language, deference, lawsuit, rental
Tax Law, State & Local Taxes, Real Property Taxes, Exemptions, Real Property Law, Landlord & Tenant, Rent Regulation, Rent Control Statutes, Administrative Law, Judicial Review, Standards of Review, Rule Interpretation, Governments, Legislation, Interpretation