Thank You For Submiting Feedback!
United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Panama City Division
July 29, 2016, Decided; July 29, 2016, Filed
CASE NO. 5:15cv317-RH/GRJ
HIPAA PROTECTIVE ORDER
THIS CAUSE came before the Court on before the Court on the Parties' Joint Motion for Entry of a HIPAA Protective Order (ECF No. 16). The Court, having considered the motion, the law, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, hereby GRANTS the motion. Any HIPAA protected information produced in this case shall be marked or otherwise indicated to have been made pursuant to this HIPAA Qualified Protective Order, and in support the Court finds as follows:
1. This HIPPA Qualified Protective Order concerns the protected records and information requested during discovery in this matter.
2. In accordance with the requirements of the regulations promulgated under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA"), specifically 45 C.F.R. §164.512(e)(1)(ii)(B) & (v), the Court hereby institutes a HIPAA QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER, as that term is defined in the foregoing regulations, and [*2] authorizes and enables all parties to this lawsuit and their attorneys, health care providers and other third parties, as follows:
a. the parties may disclose Protected Health Information ("PHI") in response to Interrogatories or Requests for Production under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;
b. all duly noticed deponents are authorized to use and disclose PHI in response to deposition questions; and
c. the parties may provide such PHI information to all experts retained to assist in the litigation of this matter; and
3. Other than as indicated above, the parties and their attorneys, health care providers and other third-parties, are required to comply with the following:
a. Prohibited from using or disclosing protected health information
Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105516 *; 2016 WL 4157367
KATHY RUDOLPH, Plaintiff, vs. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, Defendant.
Prior History: Rudolph v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38140 (N.D. Fla., Mar. 19, 2016)
parties, disclose, health information, lawsuit, healthcare provider, above-styled, regulations, marked