Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

Sandate v. Makotek, LLC

Sandate v. Makotek, LLC

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division

September 27, 2006, Decided ; September 28, 2006, Filed

Case No. 6:06-cv-601-Orl-31DAB

Opinion

ORDER

On September 6, 2006, Magistrate Judge Baker issued a Report (Doc 35) recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Conditional Certification of a collective action (Doc. 25) be denied. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 44) and Defendant responded (Doc. 45).

Having reviewed the matter de novo, the Court concurs with Judge Baker's analysis and conclusion that "collective class" status be denied. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is CONFIRMED and ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED; and

3. The consent to join (Doc. 27) is accepted and Hunter Harris is hereby added as a party plaintiff.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida on September 27, 2006.

 [*2] GREGORY A. PRESNELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70596 *; 2006 WL 4792782

JESUS SANDATE, Plaintiff, -vs- MAKOTEK, LLC, Defendant.

Prior History: Sandate v. Makotek, LLC, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101811 (M.D. Fla., Sept. 6, 2006)

CORE TERMS

Recommendation