Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
569 F.3d 946 *; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 13197 **; 48 Comm. Reg. (P & F) 60
LACI SATTERFIELD, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SIMON & SCHUSTER, INC., a New York corporation; IPSH!NET, a Delaware corporation aka IPSH, Defendants-Appellees.
Prior History: [**1] Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. D.C. No. CV-06-02893-CW. Claudia Wilken, District Judge, Presiding.
Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46325 (N.D. Cal., June 26, 2007)
Disposition: REVERSED and REMANDED.
TCPA, text message, telephone, numbers, FCC, message, district court, deference, brand, telephone number, dialing, phone, ipsh, sequential, affiliate, wireless, mobile, automatic telephone, material fact, Dictionary, cellular, agency's interpretation, summary judgment, communicate, generator, genuine, random, grant summary judgment, requisite capacity, express consent
Civil Procedure, Summary Judgment, Entitlement as Matter of Law, Appropriateness, Legal Entitlement, Business & Corporate Compliance, Communications Law, Federal Acts, Telephone Consumer Protection Act, Appeals, Summary Judgment Review, Standards of Review, Governments, Legislation, Interpretation, Administrative Law, Judicial Review, Standards of Review, Arbitrary & Capricious Standard of Review, Deference to Agency Statutory Interpretation, Business & Corporate Law, Corporations, General Overview