Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Schonfeld v. Hilliard

Schonfeld v. Hilliard

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

March 16, 2000, Argued ; July 5, 2000, Decided

Docket No. 99-7852

Opinion

 [*168]  McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge:

BACKGROUND

This case involves a closely-held cable television corporation that imploded just as it was about to launch its flagship channel. In 1988, brothers Russ and Les Hilliard formed International News Network, Inc. ("INN") to [**2]  distribute a British news and information channel in the United States (the "Channel"). Prior to this ambitious venture, the Hilliard brothers owned small mid-western cable television companies with an aggregate of only 66,000 subscribers.

To secure large-scale expertise and prestige, INN brought in Reese Schonfeld, a founder and former President of Cable News Network ("CNN") - initially as a consultant, and later as a shareholder - to help INN negotiate with the British Broadcasting Corporation (the "BBC") for a programming license. INN also retained Daniels & Associates ("Daniels"), the nation's leading financial services company for the cable industry, to prepare a business plan and to drum up investors.

In February 1994, the Hilliards and Schonfeld executed a written Shareholders' Agreement whereby each became a one-third shareholder in INN in return for a $ 10,000 capital contribution. In addition, the Hilliards, who had each already lent $ 300,000 to INN, agreed to lend up to another $ 350,000 to INN if necessary to meet its obligations to the BBC. In lieu of a further cash contribution, Schonfeld agreed to invest his time and effort.

 [*169]  The Shareholders' Agreement confirmed [**3]  the parties' understanding that INN itself would not operate the Channel. Instead, INN would invest in a yet-to-be-formed operating entity. INN's shareholders, if they chose, could increase their personal stakes in the Channel by making additional cash investments in the separate operating entity. The agreement said nothing about the percentage of profits that INN, or any other equity investor, would receive from the Channel's operation.

Although the Shareholders' Agreement provided for a two-member board of directors (one chosen by Schonfeld, the other by the Hilliards), no board members were formally designated. It appears, however, that Schonfeld assumed the three roles of director, President and CEO of INN. Russ Hilliard acted as the other director. Les Hilliard apparently played no role in INN, other than investor.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

218 F.3d 164 *; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15684 **

REESE SCHONFELD, individually and derivatively as shareholder of International News Network, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, - v. - RUSS HILLIARD, LES HILLIARD and INTERNATIONAL NEWS NETWORK, INC., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees.

Prior History:  [**1]  Plaintiff appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Mukasey, J.), granting in part defendants' motion for summary judgment.

Disposition: AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, VACATED AND REMANDED.

CORE TERMS

market value, damages, Channel, lost profits, district court, Interim, cable, promised, programming, parties, profits, entity, reasonable certainty, expert testimony, purchase price, punitive damages, projections, Remedies, Dobbs Law, rights, consequential damages, breach of contract, fraud claim, Shareholders', hypothetical, buyer, summary judgment, income-producing, speculative, venture

Civil Procedure, Appeals, Standards of Review, De Novo Review, Summary Judgment Review, General Overview, Standards of Review, Summary Judgment, Entitlement as Matter of Law, Contracts Law, Measurement of Damages, Foreseeable Damages, Damages, Types of Damages, Consequential Damages, Remedies, Business & Corporate Compliance, Sales of Goods, Commercial Law (UCC), Sales (Article 2), Breach, Excuse & Repudiation, Compensatory Damages, Breach, Ratification, Trademark Law, Conveyances, Licenses, Evidence, Hearsay, Exceptions, Statements Against Interest, Abuse of Discretion, Admissibility, Expert Witnesses, Testimony, Expert Witnesses