Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

SEC v. Blackburn

SEC v. Blackburn

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

October 12, 2021, Filed

No. 20-30464

Opinion

 [*678]  Gregg Costa, Circuit Judge:

The Securities and Exchange Commission charged these three defendants and others with selling unregistered securities and misleading investors during their operation of a penny stock company. On summary judgment, the district court found the three defendants liable on several of the Commission's claims. Among other remedies, the district court ordered disgorgement of the defendants' fraud proceeds.

This appeal presents two questions. First, was summary judgment warranted in the SEC's favor on liability? Second, was the disgorgement award "for the benefit of investors" [**2]  as Liu v. SEC, 140 S. Ct. 1936, 1949, 207 L. Ed. 2d 401 (2020), requires? This is the first time a court of appeals is being asked to decide the "awarded for victims" question since Liu was decided. Because the answer to both questions is yes, we AFFIRM.

Ronald Blackburn founded Treaty Energy Corporation in 2008. Treaty was a small oil and gas company whose shares were traded over the counter as "penny stocks." 17 C.F.R. § 240.3a51-1 (defining penny stocks); see SEC v. Kahlon, 873 F.3d 500, 502 n.1 (5th Cir. 2017) (explaining that a "penny stock" is one sold over the counter for less than $5/share). When the company was formed, Blackburn received around 400 million shares, giving him an 86.4% interest in Treaty. Though Blackburn was never a board member or an officer of Treaty—we will soon discuss the reasons  [*679]  he may not have wanted those public affiliations—he maintained significant control over the company. To cite some examples, Blackburn communicated with a foreign government on behalf of Treaty, paid the company's bills with his stock proceeds, and appointed Treaty's officers and directors.

Treaty was not Blackburn's first involvement with a penny stock company. He had previously worked at a gravel pit company that went bankrupt. During the bankruptcy, Blackburn paid over $1 million to settle the trustee's claim [**3]  that he had misappropriated company funds. And before that penny stock bankruptcy, Blackburn was convicted of four federal tax felonies.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

15 F.4th 676 *; 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 30377 **

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus RONALD L. BLACKBURN; BRUCE A. GWYN; MICHAEL A. MULSHINE, Defendants—Appellants.

Prior History:  [**1] Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. USDC No. 2:15-CV-2451.

SEC v. Blackburn, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61567, 2020 WL 1702362 (E.D. La., Apr. 8, 2020)SEC v. Blackburn, 431 F. Supp. 3d 774, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 216543, 2019 WL 6877655 (E.D. La., Dec. 17, 2019)

CORE TERMS

investors, disgorgement, district court, summary judgment, stock, funds, involvement, disclose, oil

Securities Law, Postoffering & Secondary Distributions, Scope of Provisions, Limitations on Remedies, Elements of Proof, Scienter, Recklessness, Civil Procedure, Summary Judgment, Entitlement as Matter of Law, Appropriateness, Judgments, Entitlement as Matter of Law, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Actions, Insider Trading, Disgorgement of Profits, Civil Liability Considerations, Remedies, Equitable Relief, Regulators, US Securities & Exchange Commission, Penalties & Unlawful Representations, Short Swing Insider Trading, Short Swing Trading