Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Smith v. Pyro Mining Co.

Smith v. Pyro Mining Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

October 17, 1986, Argued ; September 1, 1987, Decided ; September 1, 1987, Filed

No. 85-6063

Opinion

 [*1082]  JONES, Circuit Judge

The defendant in this employment discrimination case appeals from a judgment  [*1083]  awarding damages to the plaintiff for discrimination on the basis of religion in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e -- 2(a)(1)(1982). Because we find no error in the district court's disposition of this case, we affirm.

The plaintiff, Danny R. Smith, was hired by Pyro Mining Company on June 19, 1981, as a mechanic in an underground coal mine. Pyro employs over 1,000 persons who work underground and another 150 surface employees. During the time of his employment at Pyro, Smith was a member of the Independent General Baptist Church located in Cedar Hill, Kentucky. Smith also held [**2]  the church offices of Treasurer and Trustee at the time. He subsequently became a Sunday School teacher. The official doctrine of the church precluded all officers and teachers in the church from working on Sundays, although individuals could work on Sunday and remain church members. Based on the teachings of his church, Smith believed that it was morally wrong to work on Sundays in the absence of a life threatening situation.

During his initial employment interview, Smith informed Varney Coleman, Mine Superintendent for Pyro, that he had religious convictions against working on Sundays. Despite his convictions, Smith worked for a time on Pyro's third shift, which required him to report for work at 11:00 p.m. on Sundays. Aside from these occasions, Smith was not required to work on Sundays during the first year of his employment.

On July 11, 1982, Pyro altered its work schedule and implemented an eight-day work week for employees stationed at the mine where Smith worked. The eight-day work week was instituted to improve mining efficiency. Under the new schedule, employees were assigned to work four consecutive ten-hour days and then have four consecutive days off. Each employee [**3]  was required to work approximately twenty-six Sundays per year.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

827 F.2d 1081 *; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11655 **; 44 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1152; 44 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P37,350; 45 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P37,614

Danny R. Smith, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pyro Mining Company, Defendant-Appellant

Subsequent History:  [**1]   Petition For Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied November 18, 1987.

Prior History: ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky.

CORE TERMS

accommodate, religious, employees, replacement, undue hardship, reasonable accommodation, religious belief, guidelines, arrange, swap, religious conviction, scheduled, district court, work week, church, sin, unexcused absence, regulations, shifts, observe, eight-day, sincerely, mechanic, religion, qualified employee, implemented, discharged, prima facie case, discriminate, religious discrimination

Business & Corporate Compliance, Discrimination, Religious Discrimination, Federal & State Interrelationships, Labor & Employment Law, Title VII Discrimination, Amendments, Scope & Definitions, General Overview, Labor & Employment Law, Accommodation, Discriminatory Employment Practices, Discharges, Discipline & Transfers, Burdens of Proof, Burden Shifting, Employee Burdens, Defenses, Reasonable Accommodation & Undue Hardship, Civil Procedure, Trials, Bench Trials, Judicial Officers, Judges, Appeals, Standards of Review, Clearly Erroneous Review