Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Spriggs v. Diamond Auto Glass

Spriggs v. Diamond Auto Glass

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

September 28, 2000, Argued ; February 22, 2001, Decided

No. 99-2393

Opinion

 [*181]  KING, Circuit Judge:

James H. Spriggs appeals the district court's award of summary judgment to his former employer, Diamond Auto Glass ("Diamond"), in Spriggs's action alleging racial discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. As we explain below, genuine issues of material fact remain to be resolved in this dispute; we therefore vacate the lower court's judgment and remand the matter for trial.

This case is before us for the [**2]  second time. In Spriggs v. Diamond Auto Glass, 165 F.3d 1015 (4th Cir. 1999) (Spriggs I), we briefly outlined the facts as alleged in the complaint. Therein we noted that Spriggs, an African-American, had been employed by Diamond as a customer service representative in its Forestville, Maryland store from July 1993 until August  [*182]  1995, 1 and again from September 1996 until February 1997. On both occasions, Spriggs left Diamond's employ dissatisfied with the company's response to certain actions taken toward him by his white supervisor, Ernest Stickell. The details of these events having now been more fully developed through the discovery process, we relate them here in the light most favorable to Spriggs. See Hawkins v. PepsiCo, Inc., 203 F.3d 274, 276-77 (4th Cir.) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 875, 148 L. Ed. 2d 125, 121 S. Ct. 181 (2000).

 [**3]  A.

At his deposition, Spriggs testified that he left Diamond the first time because of Stickell's incessant racial slurs, insults, and epithets. Indeed, Stickell rarely hesitated to vilify anyone of African descent, including Diamond employees (whom he proclaimed "niggers" or "monkeys") and customers of the business. Not even Stickell's wife, an African-American, was off-limits, as Stickell repeatedly referred to her as a "black ***" in Spriggs's presence. Stickell often became enraged during telephone conversations with his wife, causing him to "fly into a barrage of racial obscenities towards her and slam the phone down. She would call back. Once again, she was a no-good nasty ***. It was continuous daily." J.A. 195.

Spriggs was eventually persuaded to return to the Forestville store on management's assurance that Stickell would be kept in check. It quickly became clear, however, that Diamond would not deliver on its promise, as Stickell's behavior did not improve, but actually worsened. In addition to maintaining his routine of talking about his wife in racially derogatory terms, Stickell habitually called Spriggs a "monkey," "dumb monkey," and "***." In one particularly [**4]  egregious episode, Stickell placed a picture of a monkey between the pages of a parts manual (known as a "NAG book") that Spriggs regularly used. Stickell had captioned the picture with X's and O's, along with the notation "so you'll never forget who you are." J.A. 209.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

242 F.3d 179 *; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2616 **; 85 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 342; 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P40,708

JAMES H. SPRIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIAMOND AUTO GLASS; RICHARD A. RUTTA; ERNEST STICKELL, Defendants-Appellees.

Prior History:  [**1]  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-97-1449-S, CA-98-1370-S).

Disposition: VACATED AND REMANDED.

CORE TERMS

hostile, summary judgment, employment action, tangible, retaliation, harassment, lockout, monkey, hostile work environment, affirmative defense, work environment, district court, genuine, adverse employment action, material fact, second term, circumstances, conversation

Civil Procedure, Appeals, Standards of Review, De Novo Review, Summary Judgment Review, General Overview, Standards of Review, Summary Judgment, Entitlement as Matter of Law, Genuine Disputes, Materiality of Facts, Business & Corporate Compliance, Harassment, Racial Harassment, Federal & State Interrelationships, Civil Rights Law, Contractual Relations & Housing, Equal Rights Under the Law (sec. 1981), Proof of Discrimination, Labor & Employment Law, Affirmative Action, Discrimination, Title VII Discrimination, Racial Discrimination, Scope & Definitions, Burdens of Proof, Defenses, Supporting Materials, Affidavits, Evidence, Types of Evidence, Documentary Evidence, Unfair Labor Practices, Employer Violations, Interference With Protected Activities, Retaliation, Wrongful Termination, Constructive Discharge, Burdens of Proof