Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
437 Fed. Appx. 897 *; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 12120 **
STAMPS.COM INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ENDICIA, INC. AND PSI SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants-Appellees.
Notice: THIS DECISION WAS ISSUED AS UNPUBLISHED OR NONPRECEDENTIAL AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENT. PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.
Subsequent History: Rehearing denied by Stamps.Com Inc. v. Endicia, Inc., 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 17778 (Fed. Cir., Aug. 1, 2011)
Prior History: [**1] Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in case no. 06-CV-7499, Judge Otis D. Wright II.
Stamps.com, Inc. v. Endicia, Inc, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131104 (C.D. Cal., Nov. 9, 2009)
Stamps, postage, patent, district court, printer, prior art, print, declaration, user, invention, offset, envelope, status report, skill, graphical, indicia, argues, asserted claim, invalidity, disclose, summary judgment, memory, patentee, shipping, teaches, corroborating, specification, coprocessor, disclosure, calculate
Patent Law, Jurisdiction & Review, Standards of Review, De Novo Review, Anticipation & Novelty, Fact & Law Issues, Defenses, Patent Invalidity, Infringement Actions, Summary Judgment, General Overview, Nonobviousness, Evidence, Abuse of Discretion, Description in Publications, Statutory Bars, Public Use Bar, Invention Date & Priority, Conception Date, Reduction to Practice, Evidence, Burdens of Proof, Clear & Convincing Proof, Antedating Prior Art References, Burdens of Proof, Preponderance of Evidence, Presumption of Validity, Invention Date Corroboration, Civil Procedure, Supporting Materials, Appeals, Summary Judgment Review, Standards of Review, Specifications, Description Requirement, Means Plus Function, Elements & Tests, Prior Art, Teaching Away From Invention