Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
782 F. Supp. 2d 1059 *; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43056 **; 2011-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P77,398
STANISLAUS FOOD PRODUCTS COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. USS-POSCO INDUSTRIES, et al., Defendant.
Subsequent History: Motion granted by, in part, Motion denied by, in part, Claim dismissed by, in part Stanislaus Food Prods. Co. v. USS-POSCO Indus., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72764 (E.D. Cal., July 7, 2011)
Prior History: Stanislaus Food Prods. Co. v. USS-POSCO Indus., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92236 (E.D. Cal., Sept. 3, 2010)
Tin, Steel, conspiracy, indirect, monopolize, antitrust, tin-plate, customers, REDACTED, competitors, quantity, manufacturer, monopoly, cost-plus, injunctive, overcharge, co-conspirator, conclusory, buying, memory, predetermined, inextricably, commerce, dramatic, supplier, Unfair, tomato, chain, flash, exit
Civil Procedure, Defenses, Demurrers & Objections, Motions to Dismiss, Failure to State Claim, Pleadings, Amendment of Pleadings, Leave of Court, Antitrust & Trade Law, Sherman Act, Claims, Regulated Practices, Monopolies & Monopolization, General Overview, Scope, Monopolization Offenses, Conspiracy to Monopolize, Elements, Sherman Act, Private Actions, Standing, Requirements, Constitutional Law, Case or Controversy, Purchasers, Indirect Purchasers, Clayton Act, Complaints, Requirements for Complaint, Price Fixing & Restraints of Trade, Public Enforcement, State Civil Actions, Preliminary Considerations, Federal & State Interrelationships, Erie Doctrine, Consumer Protection, Deceptive & Unfair Trade Practices, State Regulation