Thank You For Submiting Feedback!
United States Court of Military Appeals
June 14, 1989
No. 62343/AF. CMR 27196.
[**1] [*355] ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW
Granted on Issues I and II raised by appellate defense counsel as follows:
I. Whether the military judge erred by failing to conduct an RCM 811(c) inquiry based on appellant's confessional stipulation in prosecution exhibit 1, as it applied to specification 3 of the Charge.
[*356] II. Whether the Air Force Court of Military Review erred by failing to set aside the findings of guilty as to specification 2, after finding that an RCM 811(c) inquiry was required and was not conducted by the military judge.
Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
28 M.J. 355 *; 1989 CMA LEXIS 2795 **
U.S. v. Richard A. Honeycutt.