U.S. v. Honeycutt

Opinion

 [**1]   [*355]  ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW

Granted on Issues I and II raised by appellate defense counsel as follows:

I. Whether the military judge erred by failing to conduct an RCM 811(c) inquiry based on appellant's confessional stipulation in prosecution exhibit 1, as it applied to specification 3 of the Charge.

 [*356]  II. Whether the Air Force Court of Military Review erred by failing to set aside the findings of guilty as to specification 2, after finding that an RCM 811(c) inquiry was required and was not conducted by the military judge.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.