Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.
612 F.3d 471 *; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 14501 **; 2010 FED App. 0203P (6th Cir.) ***
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID GEISEN, Defendant-Appellant.
Subsequent History: Rehearing denied by, Rehearing, en banc, denied by United States v. Geisen, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 19467 (6th Cir., Sept. 2, 2010)
US Supreme Court certiorari denied by Geisen v. United States, 131 S. Ct. 1813, 179 L. Ed. 2d 772, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 2672 (U.S., 2011)
Prior History: [**1] Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio at Toledo. No. 06-00712-001--David A. Katz, District Judge.
In re Geisen, 70 N.R.C. 676, 2009 NRC LEXIS 124 (N.R.C., 2009)United States v. Siemaszko, 612 F.3d 450, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 14497 (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Ohio, 2010)
inspection, nozzles, deposits, plant, videos, cleaning, boric acid, reactor, cracking, district court, deliberate, captions, boron, photographs, rational jury, penetrations, false statement, indictment, ignorance, leakage, convict, letters, argues, flange, serial, visual, visual inspection, witnesses, sufficient evidence, staff
Criminal Law & Procedure, Jury Instructions, Particular Instructions, General Overview, Standards of Review, Abuse of Discretion, Harmless & Invited Error, Jury Instructions, Fraud Against the Government, False Statements, Elements, Trials, Motions for Acquittal, De Novo Review, Sufficiency of Evidence, Substantial Evidence, Motions to Acquit & Dismiss, Accusatory Instruments, Indictments, Appellate Review, Appeals, Conclusions of Law, Evidence, Relevance, Exclusion of Relevant Evidence, Confusion, Prejudice & Waste of Time, Evidence, Clearly Erroneous Review, Findings of Fact