Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

United States v. Hendron

United States v. Hendron

United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York

March 1, 1993, Decided

92 CR 424

Opinion

 [*974]  OPINION

NICKERSON, District Judge:

By order dated December 16, 1992, this court denied without opinion defendant Rajmund Szwonder's motion to dismiss the indictment. He claimed he was immune from this court's jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1602-11. This opinion sets forth the reasons for that order.

The facts so far as relevant to the motion are as follows.

During the period covered by the indictment, Szwonder, a Polish citizen, was a director in charge of production at Lucznik, a corporation wholly owned by the state of Poland. He claims that his actions were performed solely in his capacity as an employee of that government-owned corporation.

According to the government, Szwonder's role in the conspiracy was as follows. In July 1991, he arranged with a British businessman to send three AK-47 assault rifles (AK-47s) produced by Lucznik to the United States, reporting [**2]  to the Polish government that they were to be exported to Sri Lanka.

In February 1992, Szwonder contracted with Ronald Hendron, an American arms trader, for Lucznik to sell 40,000 AK-47s to Hendron's company for shipment to the Philippines. In March 1992, Szwonder met with Hendron and United States undercover agents in Germany, who informed Szwonder that the AK-47s were actually destined for Iraq, in violation of United Nations sanctions. The agents also informed Szwonder that Iraq would pay for the arms out of the proceeds from prior arms deals or Iraqi assets hidden before the Gulf War in 1991.

The agents later arrested Szwonder and Hendron in Germany. Szwonder was charged with violations of German law and held pending extradition to the United States.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

813 F. Supp. 973 *; 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2529 **

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RONALD J. HENDRON, JEHMIN LAH, STAN KINMAN, ZBIGNIEW GRABOWSKI, "a/k/a MR. BISCHEK," HEIKO LUIKENGA, RAJMUND SZWONDER, JAN GORECKI, WOJCIECH BARANSKI, JERZY BRZOSTEK, and JERZY NAPIORKOWSKI, Defendants.

CORE TERMS

immunity, foreign state, commercial activity, criminal case, indictment, courts, cases

International Law, Sovereign Immunity, Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, Construction & Interpretation, Foreign & International Immunity, General Overview, Jurisdiction, Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing, Fines, Torts, Public Entity Liability, Immunities, Judicial Immunity, Governments, Federal Government, Claims By & Against, Admiralty & Maritime Law, Maritime Liens, Enforcement, Business & Corporate Compliance, Contracts Law, Contract Conditions & Provisions, Arbitration Clauses, Arbitration, Enforcement of Arbitration, Judicial Review, Priority & Sources, Contracts, Ship Mortgages, Tort Claims & Settlements, Foreign Governments, Civil Procedure, Remedies, Damages, Monetary Damages, Dispute Resolution, Arbitration & Mediation, Agreements, Exceptions, Noncommercial Torts, Waivers, Transportation Law, Water Transportation, Licensing & Registration, Provisional Remedies, Attachment, Pleadings, Counterclaims, Punitive Damages, Trials, Burdens of Proof, Prosecution, Act of State Doctrine, Tribunals