Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

United States v. US Stem Cell Clinic, LLC

United States v. US Stem Cell Clinic, LLC

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

June 2, 2021, Decided

No. 19-13276

Opinion

 [*1304]  GINSBURG, [**2]  Circuit Judge:

US Stem Cell Clinic, LLC, its parent company, and its chief scientific officer (collectively, the Clinic) offer a procedure in which they remove fat tissue from a patient, isolate the portion containing stem cells, and inject that portion back into the patient. This procedure purportedly treats all manner of chronic conditions, from pain to Parkinson's disease.

The United States Food and Drug Administration is skeptical of the Clinic's claims. It sued the Clinic, alleging the stem cell procedure violates the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act (codified at 21 U.S.C. §§ 301 et seq.). The district court granted summary judgment for the FDA and enjoined the Clinic from offering its procedure until it can demonstrate to the FDA that its stem cell therapy is safe and effective. The Clinic appeals, arguing it is exempt from regulation because the procedure falls into either the "same surgical procedure" exception or the "361 HCT/P" exception to regulation under the FDCA. See 21 C.F.R. § 1271.15(b); id. § 1271.10. We disagree: The procedure does not fall within the first exception because the biological material implanted into the patient is not the same as that removed and the procedure does not fall within the second exception because the Clinic intends the stem [**3]  cells to perform functions after the procedure beyond the basic functions the stem cells performed prior to the procedure. We therefore affirm the judgment of the district court.

I. Background

] Since 2001 the FDA has regulated human cells, tissues, and cellular and tissue-based products or "HCT/Ps," which the FDA defines as "articles containing or consisting of human cells or tissues that are intended for implantation, transplantation, infusion, or transfer into a human recipient," 21 C.F.R. § 1271.3(d), under both the FDCA and the Public Health Service Act (codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq.). See Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products, Establishment Registration and Listing, 66 Fed. Reg. 5447, 5447-69 (Jan. 19, 2001) (codified at 21 C.F.R. § 1271) [hereinafter Final Rule]. ] The FDA has three goals in regulating HCT/Ps:

1) preventing unwitting use of contaminated tissues with the potential for transmitting infectious diseases such as AIDS and hepatitis; 2) preventing improper [*1305]  handling or processing that might contaminate or damage tissues; [and] 3) ensuring that clinical safety and effectiveness is demonstrated for tissues that are highly processed, are used for other than their normal function, are combined with non-tissue components, or are used for metabolic purposes.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

998 F.3d 1302 *; 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 16351 **; 28 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 2982

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus US STEM CELL CLINIC, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, US STEM CELL, INC., a Florida profit corporation, KRISTIN C. COMELLA, individually, Defendants - Appellants.

Prior History:  [**1] Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. D.C. Docket No. 0:18-cv-61047-UU.

United States v. US Stem Cell Clinic, LLC, 403 F. Supp. 3d 1279, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168438 (S.D. Fla., June 3, 2019)

CORE TERMS

Clinic, FDA, cells, stromal-vascular, fraction, patient, regulation, district court, surgical procedure, adipose tissue, tissues, stem, processing, implantation, homologous, removes, basic function, establishment, disease, exempt, isolate, therapy, manufacturing, intend, label, reimplantation, contamination, regenerative, recipient, offering

Antitrust & Trade Law, Consumer Protection, Deceptive Labeling & Packaging, Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act, Public Health & Welfare Law, Healthcare, Public Health Security, Communicable Diseases, Business & Corporate Compliance, Governments, Agriculture & Food, Federal Food & Drugs Act, Administrative Law, Judicial Review, Standards of Review, Deference to Agency Statutory Interpretation, Governments, Legislation, Interpretation, Civil Procedure, Appeals, Appellate Briefs