Not a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

United States v. Woodson

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division

November 21, 2018, Decided; November 21, 2018, Filed

Case No. 4:16CR541AGF(SPM)

Opinion

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In accordance with the Memorandum [*2]  Opinion filed herein,

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Defendants' Joint Motion to Suppress Title III Wire Intercept Electronic Surveillance Evidence (Doc. 323) be DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Defendant Justin Woodson's Supplemental Motion to Suppress Other Electronic Surveillance Evidence (Docs. 322 & 410) be DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Defendant Tyrone Williams' Supplemental Motion to Suppress Other Electronic Surveillance Evidence (Docs. 324 & 417) be DENIED.

The parties are advised that they have fourteen (14) days in which to file written objections to this report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1), unless an extension of time for good cause is obtained, and that failure to file timely objections may result in a waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. See Thompson v. Nix, 897 F.2d 356 (8th Cir. 1990).

Trial in this case has been set before the Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig on February 4 2019, at 9 a.m.

/s/ Shirley Padmore Mensah

SHIRLEY PADMORE MENSAH

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dated November 21, 2018.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220620 *

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. JUSTIN WOODSON-1, TYRONE L. WILLIAMS-2, TERRY T. WILLIAMS-4, HAROLD WILLIAMS-5, Defendants.

Subsequent History: Adopted by, Motion denied by, Dismissed by, in part United States v. Woodson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15409 (E.D. Mo., Jan. 31, 2019)

CORE TERMS

report and recommendation