Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Valero Mktg. & Supply Co. v. Southcap Pipe Line Co.

Valero Mktg. & Supply Co. v. Southcap Pipe Line Co.

United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois

August 12, 2009, Decided; August 12, 2009, Filed

Case No. 3:06-cv-623 DGW

Opinion

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Currently pending before the Court are Motions for Summary Judgment filed by the Plaintiffs (Doc. 118) and Defendant (Doc. 119). The Court heard oral argument on these motions on August 6, 2009. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Valero Marketing and Supply and Premcor Refining Group filed this lawsuit in August 2006, alleging that Defendant Southcap Pipe Line Company improperly removed 418,357  [*2] barrels of crude oil designated as Qua Iboe from Plaintiffs' inventory on Southcap Pipe Line (Doc. 108). Valero makes the following legal claims against Southcap:

Count I: Liability for loss of the oil under the Interstate Commerce Act ("ICA");

Count II: Liability for violation of the Filed Rate Doctrine under the ICA;

Count III: Unjust discrimination and preference, in violation of the ICA;

Count IV: Breach of Bailment Contract;

Count V: Conversion under Illinois law; and

Count VI: Declaratory Judgment.

FACTS

The parties agree and the Court finds the following to be undisputed facts. Plaintiff Premcor Refining Group ("Premcor") is a crude oil refiner. In 2005, Plaintiff Valero Marketing and Supply Company, a subsidiary of Valero Energy Corporation, acquired Premcor's parent company, Premcor Inc., which made Plaintiff Premcor a wholly owned subsidiary of Valero Energy Corporation.

Defendant Southcap ("Southcap") is an interstate common carrier pipeline and one of five joint owners of the Capline Pipeline System ("Capline"), which provides transport of crude oil. 1 Southcap has a tariff on file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC"). Premcor contracted with Southcap to ship crude  [*3] oil on Capline during the period relevant to this lawsuit. Prior to acquisition by Valero, Premcor used Capline to transport crude oil for use in its Midwest refineries. After Valero acquired Premcor, Valero took control of crude oil movement and inventory.

The Capline pipeline runs from St. James Louisiana, to Patoka, Illinois. The Capline joint owners contracted with Shell Pipeline Company LP ("Shell") to manage the receipt, transportation, and delivery processes associated with Capline on behalf of Capline's common carriers. Shell kept records for Capline and issued documentation of crude oil movement in the Capline pipeline.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70815 *; 2009 WL 2487075

VALERO MARKETING AND SUPPLY COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SOUTHCAP PIPE LINE COMPANY, Defendant.

Subsequent History: Motion denied by Valero Mktg. & Supply Co. v. Southcap Pipe Line Co., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102281 (S.D. Ill., Sept. 27, 2010)

Prior History: Valero Mktg. & Supply Co. v. Southcap Pipeline Co., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2776 (S.D. Ill., Jan. 15, 2009)

CORE TERMS

crude, barrels, inventory, crude oil, monthly statements, pipeline, carriers, delivery, summary judgment motion, preempts, summary judgment, book inventory, Carmack Amendment, Counts, Interstate, custody, meter, oil, declaratory judgment, shipment, genuine, shipper